Abstract
Summary: Deciphering the root exudate-driven interplay between plants and the rhizosphere microbiota is essential for understanding plant adaptation to the environment and future-proofing crop production. However, sampling root exudates and rhizosphere soil remains challenging due to the low throughput and destructive nature of the process. We used the staple crop barley [ Hordeum vulgare ] as a model to benchmark different sampling approaches for simultaneous exudation and microbiota profiling of soil-grown plants. Exudate profiles and total dissolved organic carbon exudation rates were consistent across different sampling approaches, whereas root biomass, root morphology measurements, and organic nitrogen exudation varied. High-throughput amplicon sequencing and quantitative PCR (qPCR) of phylogenetic markers and nitrogen cycle-selected genes revealed a protocol-specific footprint in the composition and abundance of rhizosphere bacterial and fungal microbiota. Yet, on average, 75% of microbes enriched in, and differentiating between, barley rhizosphere and unplanted soil controls were recovered across all the sampling approaches evaluated. Our results demonstrated that, under the tested conditions, different sampling approaches produced comparable microbiota and exudation patterns, enabling the integrated study of root exudation and microbial profiles from the same plant. The observed differences across sampling approaches must be considered according to the experimental scope.
All Related Versions
Funding Information
  • Horizon Europe: Root2Resilience (N°101060124)
  • ERC Starting Grant Phyto Trace (project number 801954)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (403803214)
  • Austrian Science Fund (FWF I 4445)
  • OTR15203 (Project Talent Attraction from Salamanca Ciudad de Cultura y Saberes foundation and Salamanca Council)
  • Unit of Excellence IRNASA_CSIC, from Junta Castilla y León and EU FEDER
  • DEEP-MaX-2024_IRNASA funded by CSIC
  • Scottish Government Research Programme

This publication has 55 references indexed in Scilit: