Achievement of Guideline-Concordant Care and In-Hospital Outcomes in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in Teaching and Nonteaching Hospitals
Authors:
- Gregg C. FonarowGFGregg C. Fonarow
- Deepak L. BhattDBDeepak L. Bhatt
- Maria V. Grau-SepulvedaMGMaria V. Grau-Sepulveda
- Adrian F. HernandezAHAdrian F. Hernandez
- Eric D. PetersonEPEric D. Peterson
- Lee H. SchwammLSLee H. Schwamm
- Robert P. GiuglianoRGRobert P. Giugliano
- 1 January 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
- Vol. 6 (1) , 58-65
Abstract
Background—: Secondary prevention therapies improve longitudinal outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Previous studies showed that teaching hospitals (THs) more consistently use evidence-based secondary prevention therapies than non-THs (NTHs). It is unclear whether these differences persist after initiation of a national quality improvement system. Methods and Results—: We analyzed 270902 patients across 361 hospitals in the Get With The Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease program from June 2000 to September 2009. The primary outcome was guideline-concordant care, defined as compliance with all Get With The Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease quality measures: (1) aspirin within 24 hours, (2) aspirin at discharge, (3) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blockers for systolic dysfunction, (4) β-blockers at discharge, (5) lipid therapy if low-density lipoprotein >100 mg/dL, and (6) smoking cessation. We used multivariate modeling to compare the relationship between TH and NTH status on quality measures, in-hospital mortality, and length of stay. Guideline-concordant care was higher at THs (78.4% versus 73.3%; PP =0.01). Guideline-concordant care increased from 2000 to 2009 at THs (n=176; 65.3%→88.3%; adjusted odds ratio for year increase, 1.24 [confidence interval, 1.16–1.30; PP 4 days; confidence interval, 0.58–0.94) from 2000 to 2009. Lower in-hospital mortality was observed at THs (3.7% versus 4.4% at NTHs; P <0.01), but this was not significant after adjustment. Conclusions—: Adherence to guideline-recommended therapies increased over time with participation in the Get With The Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease program, regardless of the teaching status. Guideline-concordant care over the full decade was higher in THs; however, NTHs demonstrated greater incremental improvement over time.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Improved Treatment of Hospitalized Coronary Artery Disease Patients With the Get With The Guidelines ProgramCritical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2007
- A Comparison of Acute Coronary Syndrome Care at Academic and Nonacademic HospitalsThe American Journal of Medicine, 2007
- Quality of Care for the Treatment of Acute Medical Conditions in US HospitalsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2006
- Overview of the American Heart Association “Get With the Guidelines” ProgramsCritical Pathways in Cardiology: A Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2006
- Medication performance measures and mortality following acute coronary syndromesThe American Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Care in U.S. Hospitals — The Hospital Quality Alliance ProgramNew England Journal of Medicine, 2005
- Utilization of Early Invasive Management Strategies for High-Risk Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary SyndromesJAMA, 2004
- Using “Get With The Guidelines” to Improve Cardiovascular Secondary PreventionThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, 2003
- Hospital outcomes in major teaching, minor teaching, and nonteaching hospitals in New York stateThe American Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Association of Unstable Angina Guideline Care With Improved SurvivalArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000