The Effect of a Team Strategy Discussion on Military Team Performance
Authors:
- 13 October 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Military Psychology
- Vol. 21 (sup2) , S31-S46
Abstract
In modern military operations, people from diverging backgrounds often have to work together in ad hoc teams. These team members are often well trained to perform their own part of the teamwork. However, for optimal performance they should also act as a team. The question is how optimal team performance can be realized swiftly. In this study we investigated the effect of a brief team strategy discussion. We hypothesized that a brief team strategy discussion in an ad hoc team at the start of a mission has a significant positive effect on the development of a shared mental model, on team processes, and with that on team performance. In an experimental setting, 46 four-person military ad hoc teams were presented with the distributed dynamic decision-making task. We gave half of the teams an instruction to develop a team strategy in 10 minutes, whereas the other half received no such instruction. Teams were randomly assigned to the two conditions. The results supported our hypotheses. A further exploration of the data showed that the teams in the team strategy condition showed more initiative and leadership. Finally, we concluded that accuracy gained more from the team strategy discussion than speed of operations. The results have important implications for military training and practice.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Swift Trust and Temporary Groups2006
- Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006
- Cutthroat Cooperation: Asymmetrical Adaptation To Changes In Team Reward StructuresAcademy of Management Journal, 2006
- COOPERATION, COMPETITION, AND TEAM PERFORMANCE: TOWARD A CONTINGENCY APPROACH.Academy of Management Journal, 2003
- Structural contingency theory and individual differences: Examination of external and internal person-team fit.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2002
- The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000
- Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments.Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000
- Measuring team-related expertise in complex environments.1998
- Military Team Research: 10 Years of ProgressMilitary Psychology, 1995
- Team mental model: construct or metaphor?Journal of Management, 1994