Construct Validity of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition Test in Preschool Children with Respect to Age and Gender
Authors:
Open Access
- 30 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Pediatrics
- Vol. 6, 12
Abstract
Background: The Movement Assessment Battery for Children-second edition (MABC-2) Age Band 1 is widely used to identify preschoolers with motor difficulties. Despite unsatisfactory construct validity of the original three-factor model, MABC-2 (manual dexterity, aiming and catching, and balance), previous research has not considered possible age and gender differences throughout the entire preschool period. Aim: The aim of this study was to verify the construct validity of the MABC-2 Age Band 1 in a population of Czech preschoolers with respect to age and gender. Methods: Using data from 510 Czech preschoolers (3–6 years; 4.9 ± 1.1 years), confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used for each age category and gender. Results: The goodness-of-fit indices of CFA supported the original three-factor model of the MABC-2 only in 3- and 4-year-old children, and in boys (3–6 years). Low factor loadings and ceiling effects of several test items (Drawing Trail, Walking Heels Raised, and Jumping on Mats) seem to be a probable cause of weak fit indices in 5- and 6-year-old children and in girls (3–6 years). Conclusion: These results suggest that the MABC-2 can be a valid tool for assessing motor development and identifying motor difficulties among 3- to 4-year olds, and generally fits better for preschool boys in the Czech Republic. However, in 5- to 6-year olds, ceiling effects and a low power of discrimination was found for the Drawing Trail, Walking Heels Raised, and Jumping on Mats tests. Therefore, the three-factor model is not appropriate for all preschoolers, and separate norms should be established for each age and gender.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Structural validity of the Movement ABC-2 test: Factor structure comparisons across three age groupsResearch in Developmental Disabilities, 2011
- Reliability and validity of age band 1 of the Movement Assessment Battery for Children – Second EditionResearch in Developmental Disabilities, 2011
- Movement skills proficiency and physical activity: A case for Engaging and Coaching for Health (EACH)–ChildAustralian Occupational Therapy Journal, 2009
- The Movement Assessment Battery for Children—Second Edition (MABC-2): A Review and CritiquePhysical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics, 2009
- The Movement Assessment Battery for Children: Similarities and Differences Between 4- and 5-Year-Old Children from Flanders and the United StatesPediatric Physical Therapy, 2008
- Effects of Gender and Age on Motor Exam in Typically Developing ChildrenDevelopmental Neuropsychology, 2007
- Estimation in SEM: A Concrete ExampleJournal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2007
- Performance on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children by Australian 3‐ to 5‐year‐old childrenChild: Care, Health and Development, 2007
- Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods, 1998
- Specification Tests in EconometricsEconometrica, 1978