Reliability of anatomic structures as landmarks in three-dimensional cephalometric analysis using CBCT
- 1 September 2014
- journal article
- Published by The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation) in The Angle Orthodontist
- Vol. 84 (5) , 762-772
Abstract
Objective: To identify anatomic structures in three dimensions and examine their reliability to be used as landmarks in a three-dimensional coordinate cephalometric analysis, using cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Thirty CBCT images were randomly selected for landmark location. Forty-two anatomic landmarks, which are not included in the traditional cephalometric landmarks, were chosen based on radiographic characteristics that make them pragmatic to mark in the CBCT image slices. The principal investigator marked the full set of landmarks on the software by navigating in the X, Y, and Z axes for every image three times, with each measurement trial being at least 1 week apart. One other investigator also located the landmarks once for each image for reliability purposes. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to analyze the mean differences in landmark location in all axes. Results: Intra- and interexaminer reliability for x, y, and z coordinates for all landmarks had ICC greater than 0.95 with confidence interval of 0.88–0.99. Mean measurement differences found were <1.4 mm for all landmarks in all three coordinates. Mean measurement error differences obtained in the principal investigator's trials were primarily <0.5 mm. Conclusion: The most reliable and reproducible landmarks tested for use in CBCT are mental foramina, infraorbital foramina, inferior hamulus, dens axis, foramina transversarium of atlas, medial and lateral condyles of the mandible, superior clinoid processes, and mid-clinoid.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cone-Beam Computed TomographyJournal of Craniofacial Surgery, 2012
- Precision of identifying cephalometric landmarks with cone beam computed tomography in vivoEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 2011
- Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliabilities of landmark identification on digitized lateral cephalograms and formatted 3-dimensional cone-beam computerized tomography imagesAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2010
- Reliability of Traditional Cephalometric Landmarks as Seen in Three-Dimensional Analysis in Maxillary Expansion TreatmentsThe Angle Orthodontist, 2009
- Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scannersDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2009
- Current concepts in maxillofacial imagingEuropean Journal of Radiology, 2008
- Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography imagesOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2007
- Three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of mandibular changes after orthognathic surgeryAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2007
- Accuracy of three-dimensional measurements using cone-beam CTDentomaxillofacial Radiology, 2006
- 3D-CT evaluation of facial asymmetry in patients with maxillofacial deformitiesOral Surgery Oral Medicine Oral Pathology Oral Radiology and Endodontology, 2006