International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the US Food and Drug Administration draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials
Open Access
- 23 May 2023
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 32 (8) , 2155-2163
Abstract
In June 2021, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a draft guidance for industry on core patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and related considerations for instrument selection and trial design in registrational cancer clinical trials, building on prior communications about the use of PROs to assess efficacy and tolerability in oncology drug development. The International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) Standards and Best Practices Committee led an initiative to draft a commentary about the guidance, focusing on its positive aspects and areas that would benefit from additional clarification and consideration. For comprehensiveness, the authors reviewed existing public comments on the draft guidance, and the commentary underwent a thorough review process through three ISOQOL Special Interest Groups (Psychometrics, Clinical Practice, and Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Engagement) followed by the ISOQOL Board. The goal of this commentary is to situate this new and relevant guidance document within the context of recent regulatory efforts on PROs and highlight areas in which further work may ultimately benefit the field.Keywords
Funding Information
- Select Foundation
- National Institutes of Health (P30 CA008748)
- University of Tasmania
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- International Psychometric Validation of an EORTC Quality of Life Module Measuring Cancer Related Fatigue (EORTC QLQ-FA12)JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2017
- Patient-Reported Outcomes — Harnessing Patients’ Voices to Improve Clinical CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Labeling for Products Approved by the Office of Hematology and Oncology Products of the US Food and Drug Administration (2010-2014)Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016
- Focusing on Core Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Symptomatic Adverse Events, Physical Function, and Disease-Related SymptomsClinical Cancer Research, 2016
- International Society for Quality of Life Research commentary on the draft European Medicines Agency reflection paper on the use of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in oncology studiesQuality of Life Research, 2015
- Optimizing Dosing of Oncology DrugsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2014
- Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2014
- Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2013
- Stakeholder perspectives on implementing the National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)Translational Behavioral Medicine, 2011
- How Accurate Is Clinician Reporting of Chemotherapy Adverse Effects? A Comparison With Patient-Reported Symptoms From the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2004