The Efficacy of Clinical Breast Exams and Breast Self-Exams in Detecting Malignancy or Positive Ultrasound Findings
Open Access
- 21 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Cureus
- Vol. 14 (2) , e22464
Abstract
A breast exam is a low-risk, low-cost method for early detection, which is crucial for improved mortality. However, clinical breast exams (CBE) and breast self-exams (BSEs) remain controversial with unclear guidelines. This study analyzes the efficacy of these two exam types in evaluating palpable breast masses. This retrospective cross-sectional study included 2019 medical records from Epic of women with breast lumps. Patient demographics, provider types, and breast exam types were recorded. Primary outcomes were detection of cancer and positive ultrasound finding. Fisher’s exact tests and two-sample t-tests determined the statistical significance of the association between the outcomes and categorical and continuous variables. Of 462 breast masses, 69 demonstrated positive ultrasound findings, with 26 of those yielding cancer; 96% of cancers and 81% of ultrasound findings resulted from patient-identified lumps. Of provider-identified lumps, 100% of cancers and 92.3% of positive ultrasound findings were diagnosed by MDs (doctors of medicine) rather than midlevel providers. There was no statistically significant difference in identifying cancer or positive ultrasound finding between CBEs and BSEs (p = 0.3709 and p = 0.1556). Despite no difference between CBEs and BSEs in identifying cancer or positive ultrasound finding, 25 of the 26 breast cancers were initially detected by patients, while only one of 26 was detected by CBE. BSEs detect breast cancers. Although some guidelines encourage CBEs over self-exams, not all CBEs are equal. There is no significant difference between CBEs and BSEs in identifying cancer or positive ultrasound finding. The majority of cancers were initially identified by patients. BSEs detect breast cancers and women should continue performing them. Not all CBEs are equal. CBEs by MDs, especially women health specialists, are generally more effective than those by midlevel providers.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self-detection and clinical breast examination: Comparison of the two “classical” physical examination methods for the diagnosis of breast cancerThe Breast, 2015
- Imaging Management of Palpable Breast AbnormalitiesAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2014
- Breast cancer screening in developing countriesBest Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2012
- Self-Detection Remains a Key Method of Breast Cancer Detection for U.S. WomenJournal of Women's Health, 2011
- Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation StatementAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2009
- Method of Detection of Breast Cancer in Low-Income WomenJournal of Women's Health, 2009
- Screening clinical breast examinationSurgical Clinics of North America, 2003
- Randomized Trial of Breast Self-Examination in Shanghai: Final ResultsJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2002
- Does This Patient Have Breast Cancer?JAMA, 1999
- BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION IN YOUNG WOMEN: MORE HARM THAN GOOD?The Lancet, 1985