Rectourethral Fistulas Secondary to Prostate Cancer Treatment: Management and Outcomes from a Multi-Institutional Combined Experience
Authors:
- Catherine R. HarrisCHCatherine R. Harris
- Jack W. McAninchJMJack W. McAninch
- Anthony R. MundyAMAnthony R. Mundy
- Leonard N. ZinmanLZLeonard N. Zinman
- Gerald H. JordanGJGerald H. Jordan
- Tighiouart H AndTATighiouart H And
- Alex J. VanniAVAlex J. Vanni
- Ramón VirasoroRVRamón Virasoro
- Benjamin N. BreyerBBBenjamin N. Breyer
- 1 January 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 197 (1) , 191-194
Abstract
Purpose: Rectourethral fistula is a known complication of prostate cancer treatment. Reports in the literature on rectourethral fistula repair technique and outcomes are limited to single institution series. We examined the variations in technique and outcomes of rectourethral fistula repair in a multi-institutional setting. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent rectourethral fistula repair after prostate cancer treatment at 1 of 4 large volume reconstructive urology centers, including University of California-San Francisco, University College London Hospitals, Lahey Clinic and Devine-Jordan Center for Reconstructive Surgery, in a 15-year period. We examined the types of prostate cancer treatment, technical aspects of rectourethral fistula repair and outcomes. Results: After prostate cancer treatment 201 patients underwent rectourethral fistula repair. The fistula developed in 97 men (48.2%) after radical prostatectomy alone and in 104 (51.8%) who received a form of energy ablation. In the ablation group 84% of patients underwent bowel diversion before rectourethral fistula repair compared to 65% in the prostatectomy group. An interposition flap or graft was placed in 91% and 92% of the 2 groups, respectively. Concomitant bladder neck contracture or urethral stricture developed in 26% of patients in the ablation group and in 14% in the prostatectomy group. Postoperatively the rates of urinary incontinence and complications were higher in the energy ablation group at 35% and 25% vs 16% and 11%, respectively. The ultimate success rate of fistula repair in the energy ablation and radical prostatectomy groups was 87% and 99% with 92% overall success. Conclusions: Rectourethral fistulas due to prostate cancer therapy can be reconstructed successfully in a high percent of patients. This avoids permanent urinary diversion in these complex cases.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of radiotherapy on surgical repair and outcome in patients with rectourethral fistulaColorectal Disease, 2013
- Effect of Prior Radiotherapy and Ablative Therapy on Surgical Outcomes for the Treatment of Rectourethral FistulasJournal of Urology, 2013
- Conservative Management of Urorectal FistulaeUrology, 2013
- Acquired Rectourethral Fistulas in AdultsDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2013
- Transperineal Management for Postoperative and Radiation Rectourethral FistulasJournal of Urology, 2013
- Posterior urethral complications of the treatment of prostate cancerBJU International, 2012
- York‐Mason procedure for repair of recto‐urinary fistulae: a 40‐year experienceBJU International, 2011
- Urorectal fistulae following the treatment of prostate cancerBJU International, 2010
- Dartos Muscle Interposition Flap for the Treatment of Rectourethral FistulasDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2007
- Rectourinary Fistula: Principles of Management and A Technique of Surgical ClosureJournal of Urology, 1958