On the Foundations of the Problem of Free Will
Open Access
- 28 March 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Episteme
- Vol. 21 (2) , 339-357
Abstract
In a recent paper, Christian List (2014) has argued for the compatibilism of free will and determinism. Drawing on a distinction between physical possibility (used in defining determinism) and agential possibility (used in defining free will), List constructs a formal two-level model in which the two concepts are consistent. This paper's first contribution is to show that though List's model is formally consistent, philosophically it falls short of establishing a satisfactory compatibilist position. Ensuingly, an analysis of the shortcomings of the model leads to the identification of a controversial epistemological assumption implicit in the statements of both compatibilist and incompatibilist positions. Arguing that this assumption is not currently satisfied, the paper's second contribution is to show that neither the compatibilist nor the incompatibilist position is presently well-founded.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emergent ChancePhilosophical Review, 2015
- Free Will, Determinism, and the Possibility of Doing OtherwiseNoûs, 2013
- Masked Abilities and CompatibilismMind, 2008
- Responsibility, Reason, and Irrelevant AlternativesPhilosophy & Public Affairs, 1999
- When is the Will Free?Philosophical Perspectives, 1989
- Knowledge, common knowledge and related puzzles (Extended Summary)1984
- Agreeing to DisagreeThe Annals of Statistics, 1976
- The incompatibility of free will and determinismPhilosophical Studies, 1975
- Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis)Synthese, 1974
- Main Trends in Recent Philosophy: Two Dogmas of EmpiricismPhilosophical Review, 1951