Exploring the Potential of Multi-Hydrological Model Weighting Schemes to Reduce Uncertainty in Runoff Projections
Open Access
Abstract
While weighted multi-model approaches are widely used to improve predictive capability, hydrological models (HMs) and their weighted combinations that perform well under past conditions may not guarantee robustness under future climate scenarios. Furthermore, the extent to which weighting schemes influence the propagation of runoff projection uncertainty remains insufficiently explored. Therefore, this study evaluates the capacity of strategies that weight monthly scale HMs to narrow runoff projection uncertainty. Since standard approaches rely only on historical simulation skill and offer static weighting, this study introduces a refined framework, the Uncertainty Optimizing Multi-Model Ensemble (UO-MME), which dynamically considers the trade-offs between calibration performance and projection uncertainty. In performing the uncertainty decomposition, a total of 140 ensemble runoff projections, generated through a modelling chain comprising five GCMs, two emission scenarios, two downscaling methods, and seven HMs, were analyzed for Beydag and Tahtali watersheds in Türkiye. Results indicate that standard techniques, such as Bayesian model averaging, ordered weighted averaging, and Granger–Ramanathan averaging, led to either marginal reductions or noticeable increases in projection uncertainty, depending on the case and projection period. Conversely, the UO-MME achieved average reductions in projection uncertainty of around 30% across the two watersheds by balancing the influences of climate signals produced by GCMs that are reflected in the projections through HMs while maintaining high simulation accuracy, as indicated by Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values exceeding 0.75. Although not designed to eliminate inherently irreducible uncertainty, the UO-MME framework helps temper the inflation of noisy GCM signals in runoff responses, providing more balanced hydrological projections for water resources planning.Keywords
Funding Information
- Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu (122Y083)
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analyzing the uncertainty of potential evapotranspiration models in drought projections derived for a semi-arid watershedTheoretical and Applied Climatology, 2024
- Multi-GCM ensemble model for reduction of uncertainty in runoff projectionsStochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2022
- The application of spreadsheets for teaching hydrological modeling and climate change impacts on streamflowComputer Applications in Engineering Education, 2022
- Superensembles of raw and bias‐adjusted regional climate models for Mediterranean region, TurkeyInternational Journal of Climatology, 2021
- Transferability of hydrological models and ensemble averaging methods between contrasting climatic periodsWater Resources Research, 2016
- An appraisal of downscaling methods used in climate change researchWires Climate Change, 2015
- An RCM multi-physics ensemble over Europe: multi-variable evaluation to avoid error compensationClimate Dynamics, 2015
- Assessing the uncertainties of hydrologic model selection in climate change impact studiesHydrological Processes, 2011
- Comparison of point forecast accuracy of model averaging methods in hydrologic applicationsStochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2010
- Improved methods of combining forecastsJournal of Forecasting, 1984