Ideal Combination of Anatomic Tibial and Femoral Tunnel Positions for Single-Bundle ACL Reconstruction
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 10 (1)
Abstract
Background: Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is preferred over nonanatomic ACLR. However, there is no consensus on which point the tunnels should be positioned among the broad anatomic footprints. Purpose/Hypothesis: To identify the ideal combination of tibial and femoral tunnel positions according to the femoral and tibial footprints of the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) anterior cruciate ligament bundles. It was hypothesized that patients with anteromedially positioned tunnels would have better clinical scores, knee joint stability, and graft signal intensity on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) than those with posterolaterally positioned tunnels. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A total of 119 patients who underwent isolated single-bundle ACLR with a hamstring autograft from July 2013 to September 2018 were retrospectively investigated. Included were patients with clinical scores and knee joint stability test results at 2-year follow-up and postoperative 3-dimensional computed tomography and 1-year postoperative MRI findings. The cohort was divided into 4 groups, named according to the bundle positions in the tibial and femoral tunnels: AM-AM (n = 33), AM-PL (n = 26), PL-AM (n = 29), and PL-PL (n = 31). Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the 4 groups in preoperative demographic data or postoperative clinical scores (Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scores); knee joint stability (anterior drawer, Lachman, and pivot-shift tests and Telos stress radiographic measurement of the side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation); graft signal intensity on follow-up MRI; or graft failure. Conclusion: No significant differences in clinical scores, knee joint stability, or graft signal intensity on follow-up MRI were identified between the patients with anteromedially and posterolaterally positioned tunnels.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating the tibial and femoral insertion site of the anterior cruciate ligament using an objective coordinate system: A cadaver studyInjury, 2012
- Biomechanical comparison of different graft positions for single‐bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2012
- Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic Double-Bundle, Anatomic Single-Bundle, and Nonanatomic Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2011
- Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2010
- Radiologic Evaluation of the Insertion Sites of the 2 Functional Bundles of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using 3-dimensional Computed TomographyThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2009
- Femoral Insertions of the Anteromedial and Posterolateral Bundles of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Morphometry and Arthroscopic Orientation Models for Double‐Bundle Bone Tunnel Placement—A Cadaver StudyArthroscopy, 2008
- Anatomical and Nonanatomical Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2008
- Osseous Landmarks of the Femoral Attachment of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: An Anatomic StudyArthroscopy, 2007
- Description of the attachment geometry of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the ACL from arthroscopic perspective for anatomical tunnel placementKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2007
- Knee Stability and Graft Function after Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004