Implementation strategies for school-based universal prevention: A qualitative pilot study of Enhanced and standard Replicating Effective Programs
Open Access
- 1 February 2025
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Implementation Research and Practice
- Vol. 6
Abstract
Background: School-based universal prevention programs, like the Michigan Model for Health™ (MMH), hold promise for enhancing youth behavioral health but often face implementation challenges due to insufficiently addressing priority student issues. Previous research identified trauma-sensitive content as a student need in the MMH. Enhanced Replicating Effective Programs (REP), a multicomponent implementation strategy, is well suited to support program providers in addressing priority health issues among youth. Method: This pilot cluster-randomized controlled trial compared Enhanced REP (tailored curriculum, training, and implementation facilitation with trauma-sensitive content) to standard REP (standard curriculum, initial training, as-needed technical assistance) across eight high schools serving low-income students. Through semistructured interviews at three time points, we assessed teacher perceptions of feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness related to REP core and enhanced components. Results: Teachers generally found Enhanced REP to deliver MMH satisfactory and suitable. However, the school environment, notably administrative support, influenced feasibility compared to standard REP. Enhanced REP teachers reported benefits in meeting student needs that were not seen in the standard REP group. The standard REP data helped to understand the comparative value of the enhanced strategy during a time of notable upheaval and mental health challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions: While some schools may succeed with less intensive strategies (REP), many may require more intensive approaches for effective implementation. Enhanced REP shows promise in tailoring curriculum delivery and providing additional support to meet student needs, but its success may hinge on organizational support, especially from leadership. Future research should investigate the addition of organizational-level strategies, such as leadership training, to optimize implementation and explore the comparative effectiveness of Enhanced versus standard REP.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (K01DA044279)
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cluster randomized adaptive implementation trial comparing a standard versus enhanced implementation intervention to improve uptake of an effective re-engagement program for patients with serious mental illnessImplementation Science, 2013
- Worldwide application of prevention science in adolescent healthThe Lancet, 2012
- Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Substance Abuse and Violence in Elementary Students: A Randomized Control Study of the Michigan Model for HealthJournal of School Health, 2011
- Advancing a Conceptual Model of Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Public Service SectorsAdministration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 2010
- Evidence-Based Interventions for Preventing Substance Use Disorders in AdolescentsChild and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 2010
- Evidence-Based Mental Health Programs in Schools: Barriers and Facilitators of Successful ImplementationSchool Mental Health, 2010
- Implementing the LifeSkills Training drug prevention program: factors related to implementation fidelityImplementation Science, 2008
- Prevalence, Correlates, Disability, and Comorbidity of DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse and Dependence in the United StatesArchives of General Psychiatry, 2007
- Replicating effective programs: HIV/AIDS prevention technology transfer.2000
- Effectiveness of a High School Alcohol Misuse Prevention ProgramAlcohol, Clinical and Experimental Research, 1996