Association between small-for-gestational age and neurocognitive impairment at two years of corrected age among infants born at preterm gestational ages: a cohort study.
Authors:
Open Access
- 27 April 2017
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Perinatology
- Vol. 37 (8) , 958-962
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Being Small for Gestational Age: Does it Matter for the Neurodevelopment of Premature Infants? A Cohort StudyPLOS ONE, 2015
- National and regional estimates of term and preterm babies born small for gestational age in 138 low-income and middle-income countries in 2010The Lancet Global Health, 2013
- Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age Infants Born at <27 Weeks' GestationThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2013
- Neonatal Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age Preterm Infants in CanadaAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 2011
- Neurologic Outcomes at School Age in Very Preterm Infants Born With Severe or Mild Growth RestrictionPediatrics, 2011
- Neonatal Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants From the NICHD Neonatal Research NetworkPediatrics, 2010
- A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Magnesium Sulfate for the Prevention of Cerebral PalsyNew England Journal of Medicine, 2008
- Comparisons of mortality and pre-discharge respiratory outcomes in small-for-gestational-age and appropriate-for-gestational-age premature infantsBMC Pediatrics, 2004
- Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 8 Months and 4 Years among Infants Born Full-Term Small-for-Gestational-AgeJournal of Perinatology, 2004
- Is Discordant Growth in Twins an Independent Risk Factor for Adverse Neonatal Outcome?Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2004