Commentary: Rethinking epidemiology
Open Access
- 15 March 2006
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal of Epidemiology
- Vol. 35 (3) , 583-586
Abstract
It is time, we are told, to rethink epidemiology. It is time to rethink our quest, our concepts, and the nature and origin of our commitments. That is a lot of thinking, stretching across the broad landscape of our professional practice. Even our metaphors—this blind quest for the Philosopher's Stone1—should be rethought, as well as our concept of cause, our much-maligned criteria of causation, our signature methods, and, it seems, our philosophical foundations. It is time, we are told, to step away from all that is associated with the natural laboratory of observational science, once the source of so many successes but now fraught with ‘profound and fundamental problems’, to use the precise language of Drs Buchanan, Weiss, and Fullerton.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dissecting complex disease: the quest for the Philosopher's Stone?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2006
- The Value of Risk-Factor (“Black-Box”) EpidemiologyEpidemiology, 2004
- The case for a US prospective cohort study of genes and environmentNature, 2004
- Nature, nurture and human diseaseNature, 2003
- Epidemiology—is it time to call it a day?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2001
- Beyond black box epidemiology.American Journal of Public Health, 1998
- The Sea of Person TimeInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Epidemiology Faces Its Limits1995
- Resistance by Scientists to Scientific DiscoveryScience, 1961
- SCIENCE AND HUMAN VALUESHigher Education Quarterly, 1956