Simple and Efficient Budget Feasible Mechanisms for Monotone Submodular Valuations
Authors:
Open Access
- 29 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) in ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
- Vol. 9 (1) , 1-20
Abstract
We study the problem of a budget limited buyer who wants to buy a set of items, each from a different seller, to maximize her value. The budget feasible mechanism design problem requires the design a mechanism that incentivizes the sellers to truthfully report their cost and maximizes the buyer’s value while guaranteeing that the total payment does not exceed her budget. Such budget feasible mechanisms can model a buyer in a crowdsourcing market interested in recruiting a set of workers (sellers) to accomplish a task for her. This budget feasible mechanism design problem was introduced by Singer in 2010. We consider the general case where the buyer’s valuation is a monotone submodular function. There are a number of truthful mechanisms known for this problem. We offer two general frameworks for simple mechanisms, and by combining these frameworks, we significantly improve on the best known results, while also simplifying the analysis. For example, we improve the approximation guarantee for the general monotone submodular case from 7.91 to 5 and for the case of large markets (where each individual item has negligible value) from 3 to 2.58. More generally, given an r approximation algorithm for the optimization problem (ignoring incentives), our mechanism is a r + 1 approximation mechanism for large markets, an improvement from 2 r 2 . We also provide a mechanism without the large market assumption, where we achieve a 4 r + 1 approximation guarantee. We also show how our results can be used for the problem of a principal hiring in a Crowdsourcing Market to select a set of tasks subject to a total budget.Keywords
Funding Information
- NSF (CCF-1563714 AND CCF-1422102)
- ONS Foundation for Clinical Research and Education (N00014-08-1-0031)
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Worst-Case Mechanism Design via Bayesian AnalysisSIAM Journal on Computing, 2017
- Coverage, Matching, and Beyond: New Results on Budgeted Mechanism Design2016
- Mechanism Design for Crowdsourcing: An Optimal 1-1/e Competitive Budget-Feasible Mechanism for Large Markets2014
- On the Approximability of Budget Feasible Mechanisms2011
- Budget Feasible Mechanisms2010
- Approximation techniques for utilitarian mechanism design2005
- A note on maximizing a submodular set function subject to a knapsack constraintOperations Research Letters, 2004
- The budgeted maximum coverage problemInformation Processing Letters, 1999
- A threshold of ln n for approximating set coverJournal of the ACM, 1998
- Optimal Auction DesignMathematics of Operations Research, 1981