Cost implications of PSA screening differ by age
Authors:
- Karthik RaoKRKarthik Rao
- Stella LiangSLStella Liang
- Michael CardamoneMCMichael Cardamone
- Corinne E. JoshuCJCorinne E. Joshu
- Kyle MarmenKMKyle Marmen
- Nrupen BhavsarNBNrupen Bhavsar
- William G. NelsonWNWilliam G. Nelson
- H. Ballentine CarterHCH. Ballentine Carter
- Michael C. AlbertMAMichael C. Albert
- Elizabeth A. PlatzEPElizabeth A. Platz
- Craig E. PollackCPCraig E. Pollack
Open Access
- 9 May 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Urology
- Vol. 18 (1) , 38
Abstract
Multiple guidelines seek to alter rates of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based prostate cancer screening. The costs borne by payers associated with PSA-based screening for men of different age groups—including the costs of screening and subsequent diagnosis, treatment, and adverse events—remain uncertain. We sought to develop a model of PSA costs that could be used by payers and health care systems to inform cost considerations under a range of different scenarios. We determined the prevalence of PSA screening among men aged 50 and higher using 2013-2014 data from a large, multispecialty group, obtained reimbursed costs associated with screening, diagnosis, and treatment from a commercial health plan, and identified transition probabilities for biopsy, diagnosis, treatment, and complications from the literature to generate a cost model. We estimated annual total costs for groups of men ages 50-54, 55-69, and 70+ years, and varied annual prostate cancer screening prevalence in each group from 5 to 50% and tested hypothetical examples of different test characteristics (e.g., true/false positive rate). Under the baseline screening patterns, costs of the PSA screening represented 10.1% of the total costs; costs of biopsies and associated complications were 23.3% of total costs; and, although only 0.3% of all screen eligible patients were treated, they accounted for 66.7% of total costs. For each 5-percentage point decrease in PSA screening among men aged 70 and older for a single calendar year, total costs associated with prostate cancer screening decreased by 13.8%. For each 5-percentage point decrease in PSA screening among men 50-54 and 55-69 years old, costs were 2.3% and 7.3% lower respectively. With constrained financial resources and with national pressure to decrease use of clinically unnecessary PSA-based prostate cancer screening, there is an opportunity for cost savings, especially by focusing on the downstream costs disproportionately associated with screening men 70 and older.Keywords
Funding Information
- Johns Hopkins Dean's Research Fellowship
- National Cancer Institute (P30 CA006973)
- Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (K07 CA151910)
- Johns Hopkins Individualized Health Initiative
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Role of Genetic Markers in the Management of Prostate CancerEuropean Urology, 2012
- A Systemic Approach to Containing Health Care SpendingNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Molecular Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: PCA3 and TMPRSS2:ERG Gene FusionJournal of Urology, 2012
- Active surveillance for prostate cancer compared with immediate treatmentCancer, 2011
- Time Trends and Local Variation in Primary Treatment of Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Molecular Alterations in Prostate Cancer as Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic TargetsAdvances in Anatomic Pathology, 2008
- Cumulative cost pattern comparison of prostate cancer treatmentsCancer, 2006
- Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in the United States: Implications of Various Definitions for AbnormalJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Prostate Cancer Screening in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial: Findings From the Initial Screening Round of a Randomized TrialJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2005
- Prevalence of Prostate Cancer among Men with a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per MilliliterNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004