Haemodynamic impact of stent–vessel (mal)apposition following carotid artery stenting: mind the gaps!
- 1 June 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
- Vol. 16 (6) , 648-659
Abstract
Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative to endarterectomy but its use in clinical treatment is limited due to the post-stenting complications. Haemodynamic actors, related to blood flow in the stented vessel, have been suggested to play a role in the endothelium response to stenting, including adverse reactions such as in-stent restenosis and late thrombosis. Accessing the flow-related shear forces acting on the endothelium in vivo requires space and time resolutions which are currently not achievable with non-invasive clinical imaging techniques but can be obtained from image-based computational analysis. In this study, we present a framework for accurate determination of the wall shear stress (WSS) in a mildly stenosed carotid artery after the implantation of a stent, resembling the commercially available Acculink (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Illinois, USA). Starting from angiographic CT images of the vessel lumen and a micro-CT scan of the stent, a finite element analysis is carried out in order to deploy the stent in the vessel, reproducing CAS in silico. Then, based on the post-stenting anatomy, the vessel is perfused using a set of boundary conditions: total pressure is applied at the inlet, and impedances that are assumed to be insensitive to the presence of the stent are imposed at the outlets. Evaluation of the CAS outcome from a geometrical and haemodynamic perspective shows the presence of atheroprone regions (low time-average WSS, high relative residence time) colocalised with stent malapposition and stent strut interconnections. Stent struts remain unapposed in the ostium of the external carotid artery disturbing the flow and generating abnormal shear forces, which could trigger thromboembolic events.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mechanisms to explain the poor results of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in symptomatic patients to date and options to improve CAS outcomesJournal of Vascular Surgery, 2010
- Outflow Conditions for Image-Based Hemodynamic Models of the Carotid Bifurcation: Implications for Indicators of Abnormal FlowJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2010
- Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery StenosisNew England Journal of Medicine, 2010
- Quantitative Analysis of Bulk Flow in Image-Based Hemodynamic Models of the Carotid Bifurcation: The Influence of Outflow Conditions as Test CaseAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2010
- Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2010
- In Stent Restenosis Predictors after Carotid Artery StentingStroke Research and Treatment, 2010
- A Novel Simulation Strategy for Stent Insertion and Deployment in Curved Coronary Bifurcations: Comparison of Three Drug-Eluting StentsAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2009
- Correlations Among Indicators of Disturbed Flow at the Normal Carotid BifurcationJournal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2009
- Comparison of Two Stents in Modifying Cerebral Aneurysm HemodynamicsAnnals of Biomedical Engineering, 2008
- Do unapposed stent struts endothelialise? In vivo demonstration with optical coherence tomographyHeart, 2007