Quantitative Electroencephalography Biomarkers in Patients With Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate Receptor Encephalitis: A Case–Control Study
- 11 October 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal Of Clinical Neurophysiology
- Vol. 42 (4) , 314-322
Abstract
Purpose: Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an autoimmune reaction involving Immunoglobulin G antibodies against GluN1 subunit of NMDAR. Absence of biomarkers for early diagnosis and prognosis poses a challenge. Several small case–control studies have emphasized the prospect of quantitative EEG measurements. This study aimed to analyze and identify novel scalp quantitative EEG biomarkers and their implications on outcome of NMDRA encephalitis compared with a control group. Methods: Retrospective (2012–2021) case–control study of patients with NMDRA encephalitis and with acute/subacute encephalitis from other causes. Clinical variables and outcomes were assessed with modified Rankin Scale at admission, discharge, and follow-up. All patients underwent extensive diagnostic workup, including scalp EEG within 72 hours of admission. Quantitative EEG was calculated for Renyi, Tsalis entropy, Hjorth complexity, mean energy, and spectral power of the following frequency bands and ratios: delta (0.5–4 Hz), theta (5–8 Hz), alpha (9–14 Hz), beta (15–30 Hz), gamma (31–45 Hz), gamma-beta, beta/alpha, beta/theta, and beta/delta. Descriptive statistics, power frequency bands, complexity measures, and Wilcoxon rank sum test were used. Results: Patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis had significantly higher delta frequency peak power, higher beta/alpha and gamma/beta frequency ratios, lower alpha and beta peak power, and lower beta/delta frequency ratio than the control group. In patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis, higher delta and alpha peak power had the worst clinical outcome, at discharge and follow-up, and patients with higher gamma peak power had better outcomes. Conclusions: Quantitative EEG is a valuable tool to differentiate anti-NMDAR encephalitis from other inflammatory encephalitis and predict outcomes in patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- EEG findings in NMDA encephalitis – A systematic reviewSeizure: European Journal of Epilepsy, 2019
- EEG analysis in anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: Description of typical patternsClinical Neurophysiology, 2019
- The informational entropy endowed in cortical oscillationsCognitive Neurodynamics, 2018
- Analysis of electroencephalogram characteristics of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis patients in ChinaClinical Neurophysiology, 2017
- Extreme delta brush guides to the diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitisJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 2015
- Acute mechanisms underlying antibody effects in anti–N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor encephalitisAnnals of Neurology, 2014
- Frequency and Characteristics of Isolated Psychiatric Episodes in Anti–N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor EncephalitisJAMA Neurology, 2013
- Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort studyThe Lancet Neurology, 2013
- Anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis: case series and analysis of the effects of antibodiesThe Lancet Neurology, 2008
- The Tsallis entropy of natural informationPhysica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 2007