Anterior approach with or without liver hanging maneuver versus conventional approach in major liver resections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Authors:
- Stefano GranieriSGStefano Granieri
- Simone FrassiniSFSimone Frassini
- Beatrice TorreBTBeatrice Torre
- Alessandro BonomiABAlessandro Bonomi
- Sissi PaleinoSPSissi Paleino
- Federica BrunoFBFederica Bruno
- Andrea ChiericiACAndrea Chierici
- Elson GjoniEGElson Gjoni
- Alessandro GerminiAGAlessandro Germini
- Fabrizio RomanoFabrizio Romano
- Mattia GaranciniMattia Garancini
- Mauro Alessandro ScottiMSMauro Alessandro Scotti
- 6 July 2024
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 50 (9) , 108535
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessing risk of bias in a non‐randomized study2019
- Anterior Approach to Improve the Prognosis in HCC Patients Via Decreasing Dissemination of EpCAM+ Circulating Tumor CellsJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2017
- Anterior approach to improve the long-term outcome in patients with large-size hepatocellular carcinoma having liver resectionJournal of Surgical Oncology, 2016
- Routine Anterior Approach During Right Hepatectomy: Results of a Prospective Randomised Controlled TrialJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2012
- A standard definition of major hepatectomy: resection of four or more liver segmentsHPB, 2011
- Right hepatectomy by the anterior method with liver hanging versus conventional approach for large hepatocellular carcinomasBritish Journal of Surgery, 2010
- Anterior Approach Versus Conventional Approach Right Hepatic Resection for Large Hepatocellular CarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 2006
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Liver Resection and Needle Liver Biopsy Cause Hematogenous Dissemination of Liver CellsHepatology, 1999
- Hepatic function and liver resectionJournal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 1990