The best COVID-19 predictor is recent smell loss: a cross-sectional study
Authors:
- Richard C. GerkinRichard C. Gerkin
- Kathrin OhlaKathrin Ohla
- Maria Geraldine VeldhuizenMaria Geraldine Veldhuizen
- Paule V. JosephPaule V. Joseph
- Christine E. KellyChristine E. Kelly
- Alyssa J. BakkeABAlyssa J. Bakke
- Kimberley E. SteeleKimberley E. Steele
- Michael C. FarruggiaMichael C. Farruggia
- Robert PellegrinoRPRobert Pellegrino
- Marta Y. PepinoMarta Y. Pepino
- Cédric BouyssetCédric Bouysset
- Graciela M. SolerGraciela M. Soler
Preprint
Abstract
Background: COVID-19 has heterogeneous manifestations, though one of the most common symptoms is a sudden loss of smell (anosmia or hyposmia). We investigated whether olfactory loss is a reliable predictor of COVID-19. Methods: This preregistered, cross-sectional study used a crowdsourced questionnaire in 23 languages to assess symptoms in individuals self-reporting recent respiratory illness. We quantified changes in chemosensory abilities during the course of the respiratory illness using 0-100 visual analog scales (VAS) for participants reporting a positive (C19+; n=4148) or negative (C19-; n=546) COVID-19 laboratory test outcome. Logistic regression models identified singular and cumulative predictors of COVID-19 status and post-COVID-19 olfactory recovery. Results: Both C19+ and C19-groups exhibited smell loss, but it was significantly larger in C19+ participants (mean±SD, C19+: -82.5±27.2 points; C19-: -59.8±37.7). Smell loss during illness was the best predictor of COVID-19 in both single and cumulative feature models (ROC AUC=0.72), with additional features providing negligible model improvement. VAS ratings of smell loss were more predictive than binary chemosensory yes/no-questions or other cardinal symptoms, such as fever or cough. Olfactory recovery within 40 days was reported for ∼50% of participants and was best predicted by time since illness onset. Conclusions: As smell loss is the best predictor of COVID-19, we developed the ODoR-19 tool, a 0-10 scale to screen for recent olfactory loss. Numeric ratings ≤2 indicate high odds of symptomatic COVID-19 (4<OR<10), which can be deployed when viral lab tests are impractical or unavailable.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: Chemical Senses, 46.
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nutrition and taste and smell dysfunctionWorld Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018
- Crowdsourced data collection for public health: A comparison with nationally representative, population tobacco use dataPreventive Medicine, 2017
- Prevalence and Risk Factors of Self-Reported Smell and Taste Alterations: Results from the 2011–2012 US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)Chemical Senses, 2015
- Olfaction as a marker for depression in humansJournal of Affective Disorders, 2014
- Bayesian Cognitive Modeling2014
- Olfactory Disorders and Quality of Life--An Updated ReviewChemical Senses, 2014
- NWChem: A comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulationsComputer Physics Communications, 2010
- Sense of smell disorder and health-related quality of life.Rehabilitation Psychology, 2009
- ‘Sniffin’ Sticks': Olfactory Performance Assessed by the Combined Testing of Odour Identification, Odor Discrimination and Olfactory ThresholdChemical Senses, 1997
- University of pennsylvania smell identification test: A rapid quantitative olfactory function test for the clinicThe Laryngoscope, 1984