Clinical and Genetic Spectrum of Large AIP Deletions
Authors:
- Tea Shehu KolnikajTKTea Shehu Kolnikaj
- Maren RukaMRMaren Ruka
- Artur XhumariAXArtur Xhumari
- Anila Babameto-LakuABAnila Babameto-Laku
- Panagiotis Alexandros DrakosPDPanagiotis Alexandros Drakos
- Kesson MagidKMKesson Magid
- Thomas O. MillnerTMThomas O. Millner
- Robert D. MurrayRMRobert D. Murray
- Dragana MiljićDMDragana Miljić
- Arlinda RamajARArlinda Ramaj
Open Access
- 1 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Human Mutation
- Vol. 2026 (1) , 4212742
Abstract
Familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) accounts for approximately 2%–5% of all pituitary adenomas, with inactivating variants of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor‐interacting protein ( AIP ) gene representing the most frequent known genetic cause. Clinically, patients with AIP variants often have young‐onset macroadenomas with growth hormone hypersecretion, although disease severity and penetrance are variable. Most reported AIP variants are point mutations, whereas large deletions are rare and potentially underdiagnosed. Accurate detection of AIP copy‐number variants requires methods such as multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification or validated copy‐number analysis of next‐generation sequencing data, as Sanger sequencing alone may fail to identify these alterations. Due to the rarity of the disease, it is unknown whether large deletions in the ubiquitously expressed AIP gene are associated with potentially more severe phenotype. Available data suggest that large deletions may occur in 8%–10% of AIP mutation‐positive pedigrees, highlighting the importance of incorporating copy‐number variant detection into AIP testing workflows. We analysed data from all published patients with large AIP deletions ( n = 25) and report here two novel large AIP deletions (Exons 3–4 and Exons 2–6 deletions) and three additional three families, including an Albanian kindred associated with metastatic Hürthle cell thyroid carcinoma. No major differences compared with other AIP variants were found in age at diagnosis, tumour size, hormonal profile, sex distribution or presence of other tumours. A role for AIP variants in thyroid carcinogenesis is unlikely.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Society of Endocrinology
- Barts Charity
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelinesPituitary, 2020
- AIP variant causing familial prolactinomaPituitary, 2020
- miR‐34a is upregulated in AIP‐mutated somatotropinomas and promotes octreotide resistanceInternational Journal of Cancer, 2020
- The role of AIP variants in pituitary adenomas and concomitant thyroid carcinomas in the Netherlands: a nationwide pathology registry (PALGA) studyEndocrine, 2020
- Evaluation of thyroid diseases and differentiated thyroid cancer in acromegalic patientsEndocrine, 2013
- Genetic analysis in a patient presenting with meningioma and familial isolated pituitary adenoma (FIPA) reveals selective involvement of the R81X mutation of the AIP gene in the pathogenesis of the pituitary tumorPituitary, 2012
- Characterization of aryl hydrocarbon receptor interacting protein (AIP) mutations in familial isolated pituitary adenoma familiesHuman Mutation, 2010
- Acromegaly: Re-thinking the cancer riskReviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 2007
- Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1): analysis of 1336 mutations reported in the first decade following identification of the geneHuman Mutation, 2007
- Sporadic follicular thyroid tumors show loss of a 200-kb region in 11q13 without evidence for mutations in theMEN1 geneGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 1999