Designing Spelling Instruction for Learning-Disabled Children: An Emphasis on Unit Size, Distributed Practice, and Training for Transfer
Authors:
- 1 December 1982
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The Journal of Special Education
- Vol. 16 (4) , 439-448
Abstract
This paper describes an intervention designed to enhance spelling achievement for learning-disabled (LD) elementary school children. A total of 39 LD children were instructed for 8 sessions over a period of 3 weeks. An experimental group (n = 24) was taught with lessons that incorporated reduced unit size, distributed practice and review, and training for transfer, and a comparison group (n = 15) with methods that are typically used in the teaching of spelling. While all children could spell less than 10% of the words on the pretest, the experimental group achieved 80% accuracy on spelling words taught and 75% accuracy on transfer words on a delayed posttest. This was higher than the average posttest performance of the comparison group (60% accuracy on training items and 50% accuracy on transfer items). These findings suggest that LD children can improve their spelling skills if sound remedial principles are applied consistently. The instructional sequence described in this paper can serve both as a model of effective spelling instruction and as a diagnostic, trial-remediation technique for a disabled population.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of Varying Unit Size on Spelling Achievement in Learning Disabled ChildrenJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
- Influence of Distributed Practice and Daily Testing on Weekly Spelling Tests 1The Journal of Educational Research, 1974
- Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young childJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1974
- Effect of Systematic Instruction on Ability to Generalize in SpellingThe Elementary School Journal, 1967
- Generalization of bright and dull children, a comparative study with special reference to spelling.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1930