Authorship versus "Credit" for Participation in Research: A Case Study of Potential Ethical Dilemmas Created by Technical Tools Used by Researchers and Claims for Authorship by Their Creators
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 14 (1) , 16-18
Abstract
The distinction between authorship and other forms of credit for contribution to a publication has been a persisting controversy that has resulted inKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exorcising Ghosts and Unwelcome GuestsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2005
- The involvement of professional medical writers in medical publications: results of a Delphi studyCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2005
- Scientific authorshipMutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research, 2005
- Scientific authorshipMutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research, 2005
- Changes in authorship patterns in prestigious US medical journalsSocial Science & Medicine, 2004
- On Authors and ContributorsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- The Value of Inflammation for Predicting Unstable AnginaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Proliferation of authors on research reports in medicineScience and Engineering Ethics, 1996
- Gift authorship: a poisoned chalice?BMJ, 1994
- Survey of fulfilment of criteria for authorship in published medical researchBMJ, 1994