Dilation of the cystic duct confluence in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and stone extraction in patients with secondary choledocholithiasis
Authors:
Open Access
- 17 March 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Surgery
- Vol. 20 (1) , 1-7
Abstract
Background: Many options exist for the management of cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis. Among them, laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with choledocotomy followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy has gained popularity. However, efforts should be made to ensure minimally invasive or noninvasive management of the common bile duct (CBD). The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical experience of non-invasive surgical modality, i.e., laparoscopic transcystic dilation of the cystic duct confluence in CBD exploration (LTD-CBDE), including feasibility, safety, adverse events, and incidence. Methods: In this retrospective analysis, 68 patients were offered the LTD-CBDE technique from December 2015 to April 2018 based on patient’s own intention. During the surgery, the cystic duct confluence was dilated with separation forceps and/or a columnar dilation balloon. Subsequently, CBD exploration and stone extraction were performed with a choledochoscope. The entrance of the CBD was covered with a cystic duct stump wall and was subjected to primary closure at the end of surgery. Results: Forty-nine females and 19 males with cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis were included. The mean age was 53 years old (18 to 72 year). Of these patients, 62 (91.2%) were successfully treated with the LTD-CBDE technique, and bile leakage was observed in 3 patients (4.4%). The mean operation time was 106 min, and the mean hospital stay was 5.9 days. Among the other 6 patients, 3 were converted to open cholecystectomy due to severe fibrosis, unclear anatomical structure at Calot’s triangle (n = 2) or Mirizze syndrome (n = 1); LCBDE was performed in 3 patients due to cystic duct atresia (n = 2) and low level of flow from the gallbladder duct into the CBD (n = 1). These patients had a smooth postoperative course. In total, 43/68 of the patients presented no radiological evidence of retained CBD stones at the postoperative follow-up (40 patients treated with LTD-CBDE) 1 year later. Conclusions: The current work suggests that LTD-CBDE for the management of cholelithiasis and secondary choledocholithiasis is a feasible, safe and effective technique with a low complication rate. LTD-CBDE offers another alternative for surgeons to treat patients in similar scenarios. However, additional randomized, controlled studies are needed to demonstrate its efficacy, safety, and impact on CBD stenosis.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration: 9 Years Experience from a Single CenterFrontiers in Surgery, 2016
- Systematic review with meta-analysis of studies comparing primary duct closure and T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasisSurgical Endoscopy, 2015
- Transcystic Approach with Micro-incision of the Cystic Duct and Its Confluence Part in Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct ExplorationJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2013
- Single-step treatment of gall bladder and bile duct stones: A combined endoscopic–laparoscopic techniqueInternational Journal of Surgery, 2009
- Retrospective studies and chart reviews.2004
- Primary vs. Secondary Common Bile Duct Stones: Apples and OrangesEndoscopy, 2003
- One hundred laparoscopic choledochotomies with primary closure of the common bile ductSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Laparoscopic management of common bile duct stones: transcystic approach and choledochotomyJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 2002
- Post-ERCP pancreatitis and hyperamylasaemiaEuropean Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 1998
- Prospective Evaluation of the Use of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography prior to Laparoscopic CholecystectomyEndoscopy, 1992