Writing in the university: education, knowledge and reputation
Author:
Open Access
- 2 March 2011
- journal article
- plenary speeches
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Language Teaching
- Vol. 46 (1) , 53-70
Abstract
This paper challenges the widespread view that writing is somehow peripheral to the more serious aspects of university life – doing research and teaching students. It argues that universities areaboutwriting and that specialist forms of academic literacy are at the heart of everything we do: central to constructing knowledge, educating students and negotiating a professional academic career. Seeing literacy as embedded in the beliefs and practices of individual disciplines, instead of a generic skill that students have failed to develop at school, helps explain the difficulties both students and academics have in controlling the conventions of disciplinary discourses. Ultimately, and in an important sense, we are what we write, and we need to understand the distinctive ways our disciplines have of addressing colleagues and presenting arguments, as it is through language that academics and students conceptualise their subjects and argue their claims persuasively.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- EAP reading and lexis for Thai engineering undergraduatesJournal of English for Academic Purposes, 2009
- As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variationEnglish for Specific Purposes, 2008
- Is There an “Academic Vocabulary”?TESOL Quarterly, 2007
- Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourseDiscourse Studies, 2005
- Inventing the University2005
- Bringing in the ReaderWritten Communication, 2001
- Critical English for Academic Purposes2001
- Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students' writingJournal of Second Language Writing, 1997
- Indirectness in L1 and L2 academic writingJournal of Pragmatics, 1997
- Cultural differences in the organization of academic textsJournal of Pragmatics, 1987