Sedentary Sphere
Authors:
- Alex V. RowlandsARAlex V. Rowlands
- Thomas YatesTYThomas Yates
- Tim S. OldsTOTim S. Olds
- Melanie DaviesMDMelanie Davies
- Kamlesh KhuntiKKKamlesh Khunti
- Charlotte L. EdwardsonCECharlotte L. Edwardson
- 1 April 2016
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 48 (4) , 748-754
Abstract
The file associated with this record is under a 12-month embargo from final publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy, available at http://www.sherpa.ac.uk/romeo/issn/0195-9131/. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.INTRODUCTION: Access to raw acceleration data should facilitate comparisons between accelerometer outputs regardless of monitor brand. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of posture classification using the Sedentary Sphere in data from two widely-used wrist-worn triaxial accelerometers. METHODS: Laboratory: 34 adults wore a GENEActiv and an ActiGraph GT3X+ on their non-dominant wrist while performing four lying, seven sitting and five upright activities. Free-living: The same participants wore both accelerometers on their non-dominant wrist and an activPAL3 on their right thigh during waking hours for two days. RESULTS: Laboratory: Using the Sedentary Sphere with 15-s epoch GENEActiv data, sedentary and upright postures were correctly identified 74% and 91% of the time, respectively. Corresponding values for the ActiGraph data were 75% and 90%. Free-living: Total sedentary time was estimated at 534±144 min, 523±143 min and 528±137 min by the activPAL, the Sedentary Sphere with GENEActiv data and with ActiGraph data, respectively. The mean bias, relative to the activPAL, was small with moderate limits of agreement (LoA) for both the GENEActiv (mean bias = -12.5 min, LoA = -117 to 92 min) and ActiGraph (mean bias = -8 min, LoA = -103 to 88 min). Strong intra-class correlations (ICC) were evident for the activPAL with the GENEActiv (0.93, 0.84-0.97 (95% confidence interval) and the ActiGraph (0.94, 0.86-0.97). Agreement between the GENEActiv and ActiGraph posture classifications was very high (ICC = 0.98 (0.94-0.99), mean bias = +3 min, LoA = -58 to 63 min). CONCLUSION: These data support the efficacy of the Sedentary Sphere for classification of posture from a wrist-worn accelerometer in adults. Importantly, the approach is equally valid with data from both the GENEActiv and ActiGraph accelerometers.Peer-reviewedPost-prinKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Healthy obesity and objective physical activityThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2015
- Accelerometer-measured sedentary time and cardiometabolic biomarkers: A systematic reviewPreventive Medicine, 2015
- Physical activity levels in three Brazilian birth cohorts as assessed with raw triaxial wrist accelerometryInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2014
- Detection of Lying Down, Sitting, Standing, and Stepping Using Two ActivPAL MonitorsMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2014
- Comment on “Estimating Activity and Sedentary Behavior from an Accelerometer on the Hip and Wrist”Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2013
- Methods of Measurement in epidemiology: Sedentary BehaviourInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2012
- Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms “sedentary” and “sedentary behaviours”Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 2012
- Association of Sedentary Behaviour with Metabolic Syndrome: A Meta-AnalysisPLOS ONE, 2012
- Objective and Subjective Measures of Sedentary Behavior and Physical ActivityMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2011
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986