Measurable Outcomes of Quality Improvement Using a Daily Quality Rounds Checklist: One-Year Analysis in a Trauma Intensive Care Unit With Sustained Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Reduction
Authors:
- Joseph DuBoseJoseph DuBose
- Pedro G. R. TeixeiraPedro G. R. Teixeira
- Kenji InabaKIKenji Inaba
- Lydia LamLLLydia Lam
- Peep TalvingPTPeep Talving
- Brad PuttyBPBrad Putty
- David PluradDPDavid Plurad
- Donald J. GreenDGDonald J. Green
- Demetrios DemetriadesDDDemetrios Demetriades
- Howard BelzbergHBHoward Belzberg
- 1 October 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care
- Vol. 69 (4) , 855-860
Abstract
We have previously demonstrated that the use of a daily "Quality Rounds Checklist" (QRC) can increase compliance with evidence-based prophylactic measures and decrease complications in a busy trauma intensive care unit (ICU) over a 3-month period. This study was designed to determine the sustainability of QRC use over 1 year and examine the relationship between compliance and outcome improvement. A prospective before-after design was used to examine the effectiveness of the QRC tool in documenting compliance with 16 prophylactic measures for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, catheter-related bloodstream infection, and other ICU complications. The QRC was implemented on a daily basis for a 1-year period by the ICU fellow on duty. Monthly compliance rates were assessed by a multidisciplinary team for development of strategies for real-time improvement. Compliance and outcomes were captured over 1 year of QRC use. QRC use was associated with a sustained improvement of VAP bundle and other compliance measures over a year of use. After multivariable analysis adjusting for age (> 55), injury mechanism, Glasgow Coma Scale score (≤ 8), and Injury Severity Score (> 20), the rate of VAP was significantly lower after QRC use, with an adjusted mean difference of -6.65 (per 1,000 device days; 95% confidence interval, -9.27 to -4.04; p = 0.008). During the year of QRC use, 3% of patients developed a VAP if all four daily bundle measures were met for the duration of ICU stay versus 14% in those with partial compliance (p = 0.04). The overall VAP rate with full compliance was 5.29 versus 9.23 (per 1,000 device days) with partial compliance. Compared with the previous year, a 24% decrease in the number of pneumonias was recorded for the year of QRC use, representing an estimated cost savings of approximately $400,000. The use of a QRC facilitates sustainable improvement in compliance rates for clinically significant prophylactic measures in a busy Level I trauma ICU. The daily use of the QRC, requiring just a few minutes per patient to complete, equates to cost-effective improvement in patient outcomes.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care–associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care settingAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2008
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- Reduction of catheter-associated bloodstream infections in pediatric patients: Experimentation and reality*Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 2008
- An Intervention to Decrease Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in the ICUNew England Journal of Medicine, 2006
- The 100,000 Lives Campaign: A Scientific and Policy ReviewThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2006
- Using a Bundle Approach to Improve Ventilator Care Processes and Reduce Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 2005
- Eliminating catheter-related bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit*Critical Care Medicine, 2004
- Creating the Evidence Base for Quality Improvement CollaborativesAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2004
- Improving Care for the Ventilated PatientThe Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety, 2004
- Developing and pilot testing quality indicators in the intensive care unitJournal of Critical Care, 2003