One- to two-year outcomes after surgery for cervical myelopathy: a systematic review of symptom duration and baseline severity
- 7 October 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Spine Journal
- p. 1-12
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Symptom Duration on Surgical Outcomes and Functional Recovery in Degenerative Cervical MyelopathySpine, 2025
- Prolonged Symptom Duration is Associated With Inferior Quality of Life Outcomes After Surgery for Degenerative Cervical MyelopathySpine, 2025
- Preoperative Symptom Duration Influences Neurological Recovery and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures After Surgical Treatment of Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal LigamentSpine, 2023
- The Impact of Preoperative Symptom Duration on Patient Outcomes After Posterior Cervical Decompression and FusionGlobal Spine Journal, 2022
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsBMJ, 2021
- Minimum Clinically Important Difference and Patient Acceptable Symptom State of Japanese Orthopaedic Association Score in Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy PatientsSpine, 2019
- Is Preoperative Duration of Symptoms a Significant Predictor of Functional Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Surgery for the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy?Neurosurgery, 2018
- A Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Introduction, Rationale, and ScopeGlobal Spine Journal, 2017
- ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventionsBMJ, 2016
- The Minimum Clinically Important Difference of the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association Scale in Patients with Degenerative Cervical MyelopathySpine, 2015