Effect of Thin-Walled Radial Sheath for Large-Bore Access On Reducing Periprocedural Radial Artery Occlusion Following Complex PCI: The REDUCE-RAO Randomized Trial
Open Access
- 28 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by IMR Press in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
- Vol. 23 (10) , 329
Abstract
Background: Transradial artery (TRA) access for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with lower risks of major bleeding and vascular complications compared to transfemoral artery access. Use of large-bore (≥7-Fr) guiding catheters through TRA approach increased the likelihood of radial artery occlusion (RAO). This study aimed to investigate whether use of the thin-walled 7-Fr Glidesheath Slender, allowing PCI with large-caliber guiding catheters, is superior to standard 7-Fr Cordis sheath with respect to periprocedural RAO within 24 hours after transradial coronary intervention (TRI) in complex lesions. Methods: A prospective randomized, controlled, single-blinded (patient-blinded) trial was conducted, randomizing 504 patients with TRI for complex lesions to either 7-Fr Glidesheath Slender or conventional 7-Fr Cordis sheath. The primary outcome was defined as the incidence of periprocedural RAO with Doppler ultrasound during the first 24 hours after TRI. Results: The incidence of early RAO was 10.3% for 7-Fr Glidesheath Slender and 13.5% for conventional 7-Fr sheath (p = 0.271). The procedural success rate for Glidesheath Slender was 92.9% and for Cordis sheath was 93.7% (p = 0.722). There was no signficiant difference between treatment arms in terms of local hematoma and radial spasm, whereas use of the Glidesheath Slender was associated with significantly less pain during the procedure (numeric rating scale [NRS], 2.27 ± 0.75 vs. 2.45 ± 0.95, p = 0.017). The assessment of radial artery in ultrasound parameters after complex TRI was improved with Glidesheath Slender. Conclusions: Among patients with complex coronary lesions undergoing TRI, 7-Fr Glidesheath Slender was not superior to conventional 7-Fr in the prevention of periprocedural RAO within 24 hours following complex PCI, without reducing RAO occurrence. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT04748068.Keywords
Funding Information
- Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (2021-I2M-1-008)
- Beijing Health Promotion Association (2020-ZX29, 2020-ZX52)
- Beijing Municipal Health Commission-Capital Health Development Research Project (2020-1-4032)
- Chinese Cardiovascular Association-V.G Fund (2017-CCA-VG017)
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Seven french radial artery access for PCI: A prospective single-center experienceInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2014
- Adoption of Radial Access and Comparison of Outcomes to Femoral Access in Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCirculation, 2013
- Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysisAmerican Heart Journal, 2012
- Radial Artery Patency After Transradial CatheterizationCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2012
- Effect of duration of hemostatic compression on radial artery occlusion after transradial accessCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2012
- Feasibility and Safety of 7-Fr Radial Approach for Complex PCIJournal of Interventional Cardiology, 2011
- Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trialThe Lancet, 2011
- Assessment of acute injuries and chronic intimal thickening of the radial artery after transradial coronary intervention by optical coherence tomographyEuropean Heart Journal, 2010
- A Randomized Study Comparing Same-Day Home Discharge and Abciximab Bolus Only to Overnight Hospitalization and Abciximab Bolus and Infusion After Transradial Coronary Stent ImplantationCirculation, 2006
- Comparison of 6 and 7 French guiding catheters for percutaneous coronary intervention: Results of a randomised trial with a vascular ultrasound endpointCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2005