Treating Hyperglycemia in Neurocritical Patients: Benefits and Perils
- 23 July 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Neurocritical Care
- Vol. 13 (3) , 425-438
Abstract
There is growing debate over the value of intensive insulin therapy (IIT) in critically ill patients. Available trials have been performed in general medical or surgical intensive care units, and the results may not be directly applicable to patients with severe acute brain disease because these patients may have heightened susceptibility to hyperglycemia (HyperG) and hypoglycemia. Our objective was to review the pathophysiology and effects of HyperG and hypoglycemia in neurocritical patients and to analyze the potential role of IIT in this population. Source data were obtained from a PubMed search of the medical literature combining the terms HyperG, hypoglycemia, insulin, stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), traumatic brain injury (TBI), spinal cord injury (SCI), and related diagnoses. Brain metabolism is highly dependent on constant supply of glucose. As a consequence, the acutely injured brain is particularly sensitive to hypoglycemia, which can induce a state of energy failure (metabolic crisis). Meanwhile, neurocritical patients have a high prevalence of HyperG, and its occurrence is associated with poor outcome after acute ischemic stroke, ICH, SAH, and TBI. It is unclear whether this association is due to direct detrimental effects exerted by HyperG or simply represents a marker of severe brain injury. Insulin has been shown to have various potentially pleiotropic neuroprotective properties in experimental models. However, the safety and efficacy of IIT in patients with critical brain disease have not been well studied. Available results do not support the use of IIT to maintain strict normoglycemia in this population. Patients with critical brain disease should have frequent glucose monitoring because severe HyperG and even modest hypoglycemia may be detrimental. Careful use of insulin infusion protocols appears advisable, but maintenance of strict normoglycemia cannot be recommended. Rigorous studies must be conducted to assess the value of insulin therapy and to determine the optimal blood glucose targets in patients with the most common acute vascular and traumatic brain insults.Keywords
This publication has 141 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dynamic Metabolic Response to Multiple Spreading Depolarizations in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: An Online Microdialysis StudyJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2010
- Intensive insulin therapy and mortality in critically ill patientsCritical Care, 2008
- Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patientsBMJ, 2008
- Supply and Demand in Cerebral Energy Metabolism: The Role of Nutrient TransportersJournal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism, 2007
- Influence of Hyperglycemia on Oxidative Stress and Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 Activation After Focal Cerebral Ischemia/Reperfusion in RatsStroke, 2007
- Effect of hypoglycemia on brain glycogen metabolism in vivoJournal of Neuroscience Research, 2003
- Increased Expression of Neuronal Glucose Transporter 3 but Not Glial Glucose Transporter 1 Following Severe Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury in RatsJournal of Neurotrauma, 2001
- Clinical significance of admission hyperglycemia and factors related to it in patients with acute severe head injurySurgical Neurology, 1995
- Effect of insulin of glucose and glycogen metabolism and leucine incorporation into protein in cultured mouse astrocytesGlia, 1992
- Thromboxane Biosynthesis and Platelet Function in Type II Diabetes MellitusNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990