Improving operational flood ensemble prediction by the assimilation of satellite soil moisture: comparison between lumped and semi-distributed schemes
Authors:
- C. Alvarez-GarretonCAC. Alvarez-Garreton
- D. RyuD. Ryu
- A. W. WesternAWA. W. Western
- C.-H. SuCSC.-H. Su
- W. T. CrowWCW. T. Crow
- D. E. RobertsonDRD. E. Robertson
- C. LeahyCLC. Leahy
Preprint
- 23 September 2014
- preprint
- Published by Copernicus GmbH in EGUsphere
Abstract
Assimilation of remotely sensed soil moisture data (SM–DA) to correct soil water stores of rainfall-runoff models has shown skill in improving streamflow prediction. In the case of large and sparsely monitored catchments, SM–DA is a particularly attractive tool. Within this context, we assimilate active and passive satellite soil moisture (SSM) retrievals using an ensemble Kalman filter to improve operational flood prediction within a large semi-arid catchment in Australia (>40 000 km2). We assess the importance of accounting for channel routing and the spatial distribution of forcing data by applying SM–DA to a lumped and a semi-distributed scheme of the probability distributed model (PDM). Our scheme also accounts for model error representation and seasonal biases and errors in the satellite data. Before assimilation, the semi-distributed model provided more accurate streamflow prediction (Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency, NS = 0.77) than the lumped model (NS = 0.67) at the catchment outlet. However, this did not ensure good performance at the "ungauged" inner catchments. After SM–DA, the streamflow ensemble prediction at the outlet was improved in both the lumped and the semi-distributed schemes: the root mean square error of the ensemble was reduced by 27 and 31%, respectively; the NS of the ensemble mean increased by 7 and 38%, respectively; the false alarm ratio was reduced by 15 and 25%, respectively; and the ensemble prediction spread was reduced while its reliability was maintained. Our findings imply that even when rainfall is the main driver of flooding in semi-arid catchments, adequately processed SSM can be used to reduce errors in the model soil moisture, which in turn provides better streamflow ensemble prediction. We demonstrate that SM–DA efficacy is enhanced when the spatial distribution in forcing data and routing processes are accounted for. At ungauged locations, SM–DA is effective at improving streamflow ensemble prediction, however, the updated prediction is still poor since SM–DA does not address systematic errors in the model.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Published version: Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19 (4), 1659.
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- The impacts of assimilating satellite soil moisture into a rainfall–runoff model in a semi-arid catchmentJournal of Hydrology, 2014
- Evaluation of remotely sensed and modelled soil moisture products using global ground-based in situ observationsRemote Sensing of Environment, 2012
- Soil moisture estimation through ASCAT and AMSR-E sensors: An intercomparison and validation study across EuropeRemote Sensing of Environment, 2011
- Cross-evaluation of modelled and remotely sensed surface soil moisture with in situ data in southwestern FranceHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2010
- Improving runoff prediction through the assimilation of the ASCAT soil moisture productHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2010
- An evaluation of ASCAT surface soil moisture products with in-situ observations in Southwestern FranceHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2009
- Antecedent wetness conditions based on ERS scatterometer dataJournal of Hydrology, 2009
- From near-surface to root-zone soil moisture using an exponential filter: an assessment of the method based on in-situ observations and model simulationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2008
- A Method for Producing and Evaluating Probabilistic Forecasts from Ensemble Model IntegrationsJournal of Climate, 1996
- Macropores and water flow in soilsWater Resources Research, 1982