Trocar-Guided Transvaginal Mesh Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Authors:
- Caroline ElmérCECaroline Elmér
- Daniel AltmanDADaniel Altman
- Marie Ellström EnghMEMarie Ellström Engh
- Susanne AxelsenSASusanne Axelsen
- Tapio VäyrynenTVTapio Väyrynen
- Christian FalconerCFChristian Falconer
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 113 (1) , 117-126
Abstract
To prospectively assess clinical outcomes after pelvic organ prolapse repair with a standardized trocar-guided surgical device using polypropylene mesh. This was a prospective multicenter cohort study performed throughout 26 clinics. Evaluation at baseline, 2 months, and 1 year after surgery included prolapse grading using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q) and symptom assessment using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7) and Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6). For the purpose of this study, postoperative POP-Q stage 0-I was considered anatomic cure. Two-hundred sixty-one patients were included in the study; 232 (89%) attended the 1-year follow-up. Mean+/-standard deviation age at surgery was 66.3+/-9.4 years. Anatomic cure 1 year after surgery was observed in 96 of 121 women (79%) after anterior repair with mesh (P<.001), and 56 of 68 (82%) after posterior repair with mesh (P<.001). For combined anterior and posterior mesh repair, cure was 51 of 63 (81%) and 54 of 63 (86%) for the anterior and posterior compartment, respectively (P<.001 for both). Bladder and rectal perforations occurred in 9 of 252 patients (3.4%). Vaginal erosions, the majority mild to moderate, occurred in 26 of 232 cases (11%). Surgical intervention due to mesh exposure occurred in seven cases (2.8%). There were significant quality-of-life improvements in all domains of the IIQ-7. Despite significant improvements in UDI-6 scores, symptoms specific for stress urinary incontinence were not ameliorated. Trocar-guided transvaginal mesh surgery for pelvic organ prolapse is associated with satisfactory objective and subjective outcomes 1 year after surgery. ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00402844 II.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- “First do no harm” and the emerging story of the vaginal reconstructive mesh implantInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2007
- Marketed vaginal mesh kits: rampant experimentation or improved quality of care?International Urogynecology Journal, 2007
- Perioperative Morbidity Using Transvaginal Mesh in Pelvic Organ Prolapse RepairObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Long‐term results of the tension‐free vaginal tape operation in an unselected group of 129 stress incontinent womenActa Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2006
- Évolution des idées sur le traitement chirurgical des prolapsus génitauxJournal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 2004
- The use and misuse of prosthetic materials in reconstructive pelvic surgery: does the evidence support our surgical practice?International Urogynecology Journal, 2003
- Mechanical properties of urogynecologic implant materialsInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2003
- Prospective multicentre randomised trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension as primary treatment for stress incontinenceBMJ, 2002
- Influence of Different Sling Materials on Connective Tissue Metabolism in Stress Urinary Incontinent WomenInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2001
- Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinenceObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997