Lumbopelvic pain and sick leave during pregnancy: A comparison of Italy and Norway
Open Access
- 1 January 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Women's Health
- Vol. 19
Abstract
Background: Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain is a frequently reported musculoskeletal disorder, but few studies have compared data between countries. Objectives: Examine prevalence, severity, and sick leave and explore potential risk factors associated with pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain in Italian women and compare the results to a similar study in Norway, utilizing the same questionnaire. Design: Cross-sectional Methods: Italian ( n = 481) and Norwegian women ( n = 435) were allocated from two public hospitals in Rome (Fatebenefratelli San Giovanni Calibita-Isola Tiberina) and Oslo (Oslo University Hospital), as well as four antenatal clinics in Modena (Italy). The questionnaire was completed between gestation weeks 32 and 36, addressing women’s experiences of pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain and sick leave in current week, and retrospectively for prepregnancy, first and second trimesters. Results: In Italy and Norway, 39% and 57% of pregnant women reported pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain, respectively, with 11% and 25% experiencing severe pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain. Pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain was associated with sick leave in Norway ( p < 0.01), but not in Italy ( p = 0.66) at late gestation. In both countries, women with pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain versus those with no pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain were more likely to be multiparous (Italy: 40% versus 31%, p = 0.06 and Norway: 53% versus 38%, p < 0.01), and have gestational weight gain above guidelines (Italy: 21% versus 13%, p = 0.02% and Norway: 27% versus 14%, p < 0.01) and previous experience of pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain (Italy: 15% versus 2%, p < 0.01 and Norway: 31% versus 4%, p < 0.01). Maternal exercise (⩾2 times weekly) was associated with less pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain (Italy: odds ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval = 0.11–1.0, p = 0.05 and Norway: odds ratio = 0.55, 95% confidence interval = 0.29–1.0, p = 0.06). Conclusion: We observed high rates of pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain in Italy and Norway, with Norwegian women reporting the highest prevalence and severity level. While both countries had similar rates of sick leave in late gestation, an association between pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain and sick leave was observed among Norwegian women only. Health care providers should be proactive in addressing pregnancy-related lumbopelvic pain through open communication and seeking input from pregnant individuals. However, it is essential to acknowledge that the current evidence on effective treatments remains limited and inconclusive, highlighting the need for further research in this field.Keywords
This publication has 56 references indexed in Scilit:
- “Struggling with daily life and enduring pain”: a qualitative study of the experiences of pregnant women living with pelvic girdle painBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2013
- Life’s pregnant pause of pain: Pregnant women’s experiences of pelvic girdle pain related to daily life: A Swedish interview studySexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 2013
- Pregnancy-Related Lumbopelvic Pain: Listening to Australian WomenNursing Research and Practice, 2012
- The Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire: A Condition-Specific Instrument for Assessing Activity Limitations and Symptoms in People With Pelvic Girdle PainPhysical Therapy, 2011
- Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain: an updateBMC Medicine, 2011
- Pelvic girdle pain, clinical tests and disability in late pregnancyManual Therapy, 2010
- European guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pelvic girdle painEuropean Spine Journal, 2008
- Pregnancy Related Pelvic Girdle Pain and Low Back Pain in an Iranian PopulationSpine, 2007
- Pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PPP), I: Terminology, clinical presentation, and prevalenceEuropean Spine Journal, 2004
- Is pelvic pain in pregnancy a welfare complaint?Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2000