Human Papillomavirus Same Genotype Persistence and Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia2+ Recurrence
Authors:
- Anna Daniela IacoboneAnna Daniela Iacobone
- Davide RadiceDavide Radice
- Maria Teresa SandriMaria Teresa Sandri
- Eleonora Petra PretiEleonora Petra Preti
- Maria Elena GuerrieriMaria Elena Guerrieri
- Ailyn Mariela Vidal UrbinatiAilyn Mariela Vidal Urbinati
- Ida PinoIda Pino
- Dorella FranchiDorella Franchi
- Rita PasseriniRita Passerini
- Fabio BottariFabio Bottari
Open Access
Abstract
To evaluate the significance of HPV persistence as a predictor for the development of CIN2+ recurrence and the impact of multiple genotypes and of HPV 16/18 on recurrence risk. A prospective cohort observational study was carried out at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy, from December 2006 to December 2014. A total of 408 women surgically treated by excisional procedure for pre-neoplastic and neoplastic cervical lesions were enrolled. HPV test was performed at baseline and at first follow-up visit planned at 6 ± 3 months after treatment. Two-year cumulative incidences for relapse were estimated and compared by the Gray’s test. Overall, 96 (23.5%) patients were persistent for at least one genotype at three to nine months from baseline and 21 (5.1%) patients relapsed. The two-year cumulative relapse incidence was higher in HPV persistent patients compared to not-persistent (CIF = 27.6%, 95% CI: 16.2–40.2% versus CIF = 1.7%, 95% CI: 0.3–5.8%, p < 0.001), in women with persistent multiple infections (CIF = 27.2%, 95% CI: 7.3–52.3%, p < 0.001), and with the persistence of at least one genotype between 16 and 18, irrespective of the presence of other HR genotypes (CIF = 32.7%, 95% CI: 17.9–48.3%, p < 0.001), but not significantly different from women positive for single infections or any other HR genotype, but not for 16 and 18. The risk of CIN2+ recurrence should not be underestimated when same HPV genotype infection persists after treatment.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Human Papillomavirus Type Distribution in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 2/3 and Cervical Cancer in PortugalInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 2013
- Long-term Absolute Risk of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia Grade 3 or Worse Following Human Papillomavirus Infection: Role of PersistenceJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2010
- Significance of human papillomavirus genotyping with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated by a loop electrosurgical excision procedureAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2010
- Clearance of human papillomavirus infection after successful conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasiaInternational Journal of Cancer, 2009
- Papillomaviruses in the causation of human cancers — a brief historical accountVirology, 2009
- Significance and possible causes of false-negative results of reflex human papillomavirus infection testingCancer, 2007
- HPV DNA patterns and disease implications in the follow-up of patients treated for HPV16 high-grade carcinoma in situJournal of Medical Virology, 2006
- Rate of human papillomavirus clearance after treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 , *1Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2002
- Niehtparametrische Ansätze zur Auswertung von VerlaufskurvenBiometrische Zeitschrift, 1973
- A Test for Symmetry in Contingency TablesJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1948