Local Political Knowledge and Assessments of Citizen Competence
Author:
- 9 August 2012
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Public Opinion Quarterly
- Vol. 76 (3) , 525-537
Abstract
This article contrasts the national and local political knowledge of a random sample of 993 Philadelphians with the aim of enhancing the scholarly understanding of citizen competence. Empirical study of citizen competence extends back more than fifty years, but the survey data that have been brought to bear upon the topic are almost exclusively focused on national-level politics. Consequently, sweeping conclusions about the competence of the American public rest upon a narrow foundation. The comparisons in this article depict a slew of differences in the distribution of knowledge across national and local politics, many of which challenge established notions of who is politically knowledgeable. This, in turn, has implications for which members of society are seen as politically competent and how competent the public as a whole is thought to be.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Causes and Consequences of Response Rates in Surveys by the News Media and Government Contractor Survey Research Firms2007
- How elitism undermines the study of voter competenceCritical Review, 2006
- The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics2004
- Knowledge of Politics and Sense of Subjective Political CompetenceAmerican Politics Quarterly, 1997
- ?Know-nothings? revisited againPolitical Behavior, 1996
- Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review, 1994
- Explaining political sophisticationPolitical Behavior, 1990
- Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black EmpowermentAmerican Political Science Review, 1990
- Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary AmericaPolitical Behavior, 1990
- Some Reasons Why Information Campaigns FailPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1947