Science: An unreliable friend to environmental education?
Author:
- 1 August 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Environmental Education Research
- Vol. 6 (3) , 269-280
Abstract
This article focuses upon the uneasy relationship between science and environmental education. It argues that science probably offers the strongest justification for the adoption of pro-environmental behaviours and policies, but that the relationship between science and environmentalism is strained by conflicts over fundamental values that are apparent in interpretation of the precautionary principle. An understanding of risk and scientific uncertainty is seen as an essential element of citizenship education for a sustainable society. Curriculum design needs to respond to the challenges of living in a risk society. The article argues for changes to the curriculum which lead to a scientific action competence founded in an understanding of the limits of science and an appreciation of the fact that scientists are moral agents who face ethical dilemmas in their work.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Modern Environmentalism2002
- Education for the Environment: a critiqueEnvironmental Education Research, 1998
- Deconstructing action competence: developing a case for a more scientifically-attentive environmental educationPublic Understanding of Science, 1998
- Justification, truth, and the development of scienceStudies in History and Philosophy of Science, 1998
- Setting priorities for adapting to climate changeGlobal Environmental Change, 1997
- The Structure of Scientific Revolutions1996
- Practical reasoning and science education: Implications for theory and practiceScience & Education, 1993
- Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of sciencePublic Understanding of Science, 1992
- Computational Philosophy of Science1988
- Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes1970