Insights into the Composition of a Co-Culture of 10 Probiotic Strains (OMNi BiOTiC® AAD10) and Effects of Its Postbiotic Culture Supernatant
Authors:
- Bernhard KienesbergerBKBernhard Kienesberger
- Beate ObermüllerBOBeate Obermüller
- Georg SingerGeorg Singer
- Christoph ArneitzCAChristoph Arneitz
- Paolo GasparellaPGPaolo Gasparella
- Ingeborg KlymiukIKIngeborg Klymiuk
- Angela HorvathAHAngela Horvath
- Vanessa StadlbauerVanessa Stadlbauer
- Christoph MagnesCMChristoph Magnes
- Elmar ZügnerEZElmar Zügner
- Pablo López-GarcíaPLPablo López-García
- Slave TrajanoskiSTSlave Trajanoski
Open Access
Abstract
Background: We aimed to gain insights in a co-culture of 10 bacteria and their postbiotic supernatant. Methods: Abundances and gene expression were monitored by shotgun analysis. The supernatant was characterized by liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy (LC-MS) and gas chromatography mass spectroscopy (GC-MS). Supernatant was harvested after 48 h (S48) and 196 h (S196). Susceptibility testing included nine bacteria and C. albicans. Bagg albino (BALBc) mice were fed with supernatant or culture medium. Fecal samples were obtained for 16S analysis. Results: A time-dependent decrease of the relative abundances and gene expression of L. salivarius, L. paracasei, E. faecium and B. longum/lactis and an increase of L. plantarum were observed. Substances in LC-MS were predominantly allocated to groups amino acids/peptides/metabolites and nucleotides/metabolites, relating to gene expression. Fumaric, panthotenic, 9,3-methyl-2-oxovaleric, malic and aspartic acid, cytidine monophosphate, orotidine, phosphoserine, creatine, tryptophan correlated to culture time. Supernatant had no effect against anaerobic bacteria. S48 was reactive against S. epidermidis, L. monocytogenes, P. aeruginosae, E. faecium and C. albicans. S196 against S. epidermidis and Str. agalactiae. In vivo S48/S196 had no effect on alpha/beta diversity. Linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) and analysis of composition of microbiomes (ANCOM) revealed an increase of Anaeroplasma and Faecalibacterium prausnitzii. Conclusions: The postbiotic supernatant had positive antibacterial and antifungal effects in vitro and promoted the growth of distinct bacteria in vivo.Keywords
Funding Information
- Austrian Research Promoting Agency (867991)
- Institut Allergosan, Graz, Austria (n/a)
This publication has 65 references indexed in Scilit:
- Postbiotics: what else?Beneficial Microbes, 2013
- Occam’s razor and probiotics activity on Listeria monocytogenesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Probiotics in the Development and Treatment of Allergic DiseaseGastroenterology Clinics of North America, 2012
- The Effect of Inactivated Lactobacillus LB Fermented Culture Medium on Symptom Severity: Observational Investigation in 297 Patients with Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel SyndromeDigestive Diseases, 2011
- Susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni to organic acids and monoacylglycerolsFolia Microbiologica, 2010
- Effect of Organic Acids and Plant Extracts on Escherichia coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, and Salmonella Typhimurium in Broth Culture Model and Chicken Meat SystemsJournal of Food Science, 2009
- The role of SOS boxes in enteric bacteriocin regulationMicrobiology, 2008
- Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of traveler's diarrheaTravel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 2007
- Stimulation of Nisin Production From Whey by a Mixed Culture of Lactococcus lactis and Saccharomyces cerevisiaeApplied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2006
- Monostrain, multistrain and multispecies probiotics—A comparison of functionality and efficacyInternational Journal of Food Microbiology, 2004