Long‐term stability of vertical bone augmentation in implant dentistry: A domain‐based review
Open Access
- 24 April 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Periodontology 2000
Abstract
Objectives: Vertical ridge deficiency remains one of the most challenging conditions in preimplant surgery. Several techniques aim to restore lost vertical alveolar height, each with specific indications and limitations. Although these procedures often yield favorable short‐term outcomes with stable bone levels, their long‐term performance is crucial for determining true clinical value. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of three databases identified 614 records, of which 35 studies met the eligibility criteria of a minimum of 5 years of follow‐up that performed vertical ridge augmentation. This review applied a domain‐based evaluation framework derived from the Implant Dentistry Core Outcome Set and Measurement (ID‐COSM) and the Bone Augmentation Core Outcome Set (BA‐COSM). Implant survival and marginal bone loss were synthesized using random‐effects models with inverse‐variance weighting, with analyses stratified by follow‐up duration and vertical ridge augmentation approach. Results: Implants placed in vertically augmented bone showed high long‐term success, with survival rates of 96% at 5 years, 94% at 10 years, 98% at 15 years, and 95% at 20 years. Marginal bone levels remained stable, with a mean bone loss of 0.67 mm at 5 years and 0.72 mm at 10 years, 1.52 mm at 15 years and 1.53 mm at 20 years. Conclusions: Vertical ridge augmentation techniques support predictable implant survival and bone stability. However, heterogeneous reporting of outcomes limits comparability. A standardized, domain‐based framework enhances evidence synthesis and clinical relevance in implant dentistry.Keywords
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prevalence, incidence, systemic, behavioral, and patient‐related risk factors and indicators for peri‐implant diseases: An AO/AAP systematic review and meta‐analysisJournal of Periodontology, 2025
- Vertical bone augmentation and regular implants versus short implants in the vertically deficient posterior mandible: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studiesInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2021
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
- Risk‐of‐bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk‐of‐bias assessmentsResearch Synthesis Methods, 2020
- Short implants (6 mm) vs. vertical bone augmentation and standard-length implants (≥9 mm) in atrophic posterior mandibles: a 5-year retrospective studyInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2017
- Bilamina cortical tenting grafting technique for three-dimensional reconstruction of severely atrophic alveolar ridges in anterior maxillae: A 6-year prospective studyJournal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 2016
- Reconstruction of the extremely atrophied mandible with iliac crest onlay grafts followed by two endosteal implants: a retrospective study with long-term follow-upInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2014
- Reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with interpositional bone grafting/Le Fort I osteotomy and endosteal implants: A 11–16 year follow-upInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2009
- Alveolar Segmental Sandwich Osteotomy for Anterior Maxillary Vertical Augmentation Prior to Implant PlacementJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2006
- 10-year follow-up of onlay bone grafts and implants in severely resorbed maxillaeInternational Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2004