Two-to-One Randomization: Rarely Advisable
- 1 December 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in JCO Oncology Practice
- Vol. 20 (12) , 1555-1558
Abstract
In a randomized clinical trial, instead of allocating patients equally between the treatment arms, some trials in oncology assign a higher proportion of patients to receive the experimental treatment arm (eg, a two-to-one randomization). In this commentary, we first briefly review the common reasons given for the use of a two-to-one randomization and provide some examples of trials using these designs. We then explain why the risk-benefit ratio of this approach may not be favorable as is commonly assumed.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy in RET Fusion–Positive NSCLCNew England Journal of Medicine, 2024
- First-Line Selpercatinib or Chemotherapy and Pembrolizumab in RET Fusion–Positive NSCLCNew England Journal of Medicine, 2023
- Minimization in randomized clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2023
- Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Pediatric Glioma with BRAF V600 MutationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2023
- Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Limitations of the VISION TrialEuropean Urology, 2022
- The saga of PI3K inhibitors in haematological malignancies: survival is the ultimate safety endpointThe Lancet Oncology, 2022
- Lomustine and Bevacizumab in Progressive GlioblastomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Development of a complex intervention improved randomization and informed consent in a randomized controlled trialJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- On inferences from Wei's biased coin design for clinical trialsBiometrika, 1990
- Practical experience of randomization in cancer trials: an international surveyBritish Journal of Cancer, 1982