A Weight lifting Belt Increases Squat Performance and Subjectively Perceived But Not Objectively Measured Postural Stability
- 23 March 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
- Vol. 40 (8) , 944-952
Abstract
Veltzke, F, Qiu, F, Bey, ME, and Legerlotz, K. A weightlifting belt increases squat performance and subjectively perceived but not objectively measured postural stability. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—Weight lifting belts are subjectively perceived to enhance stability and improve athletic performance. However, the mechanisms underlying performance enhancement are poorly researched. This study thus aims to determine whether athletic performance and postural stability are objectively increased by wearing a weightlifting belt, and whether the effects are affected by sex or experience with belt application. Belt experienced ( n = 15) and unexperienced ( n = 14) men (height 182 ± 7 cm; body mass 88 ± 10 kg), and experienced ( n = 11) and unexperienced ( n = 9) women (height 168 ± 6 cm; body mass 66 ± 6 kg) participated in 2 measurement sessions 1 week apart. In each session, 2 sets of squats to exhaustion with the beltless 6 repetition maximum weight were performed while standing on force plates, wearing (B) or not wearing (noB) the belt in a randomized order, which was reversed in the second measurement session. The number of repetitions, movement duration, postural sway, and subjectively perceived stability were compared between conditions. With belt application, the number of repetitions increased, regardless of sex or belt experience (B_8.1 ± 1.7; noB_6.5 ± 1.3, ρ < 0.001; Wilcoxon-Test), whereas the duration of the concentric phase of squats decreased (B_1.99 ± 0.2 s; noB_2.09 ± 0.2 s, ρ < 0.001; t-Test). Wearing the belt subjectively increased postural stability (Score_3.7; ρ < 0.001; t-Test), but did not do so objectively. The path length, adjusted for movement duration, was significantly increased in experienced individuals (noB_13.4 ± 2.3 cm·s −1 ; B_13.7 ± 2.8 cm·s −1 ; ρ = 0.045; t-Test). Belt application led to an improvement in squat performance, in terms of increased movement velocity and number of repetitions, in both men and women, irrespective of prior experience. However, this improvement cannot be attributed to an increase in postural stability.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of balance performance between masters Olympic weightlifters and runnersScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2020
- The effect of a maternity support belt on static stability and posture in pregnant and non-pregnant womenJournal of Biomechanics, 2018
- Causal effect of intra-abdominal pressure on maximal voluntary isometric hip extension torqueEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2017
- Associations of maximal voluntary isometric hip extension torque with muscle size of hamstring and gluteus maximus and intra-abdominal pressureEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2017
- The effect of hip belt use and load placement in a backpack on postural stability and perceived exertion: a within-subjects trialErgonomics, 2014
- Effect of a Stiff Lifting Belt on Spine Compression During LiftingSpine, 2006
- Can increased intra-abdominal pressure in humans be decoupled from trunk muscle co-contraction during steady state isometric exertions?European Journal of Applied Physiology, 2002
- Effects of abdominal belts on intra-abdominal pressure, intramuscular pressure in the erector spinae muscles and myoelectrical activities of trunk musclesClinical Biomechanics, 1999
- Does a back support have a positive biomechanical effect?Applied Ergonomics, 1996
- The effect of an abdominal belt on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure during squat liftsErgonomics, 1990