Rectal Prolapse: Rectopexy vs Perineal Proctosigmoidectomy

This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:

• Meta-analysis of laparoscopic mesh rectopexy versus posterior sutured rectopexy for management of complete rectal prolapse
  International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021
• Functional Outcome after Laparoscopic Posterior Sutured Rectopexy Versus Ventral Mesh Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: Six-year Follow-up of a Double-blind, Randomized Single-center Study
  eClinicalMedicine, 2019
• Robotic vs. laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception: a systematic review
  Techniques in Coloproctology, 2019
• Long‐term outcomes of surgical management of rectal prolapse
  Anz Journal of Surgery, 2019
• Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness external rectal prolapse: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of the predictors for recurrence
  Surgical Endoscopy, 2019
• Laparoscopic Ventral Rectopexy Versus Laparoscopic Wells Rectopexy for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Long-Term Results
  Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2018
• Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study
  Colorectal Disease, 2017
• PROSPER: a randomised comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse
  Colorectal Disease, 2013
• Complete rectal prolapse
  Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1999
• Abdominal resection rectopexy with pelvic floor repair versus perineal rectosigmoidectomy and pelvic floor repair for full-thickness rectal prolapse
  British Journal of Surgery, 1994