Comparison Facilitates Children's Learning of Names for Parts
Authors:
- 10 August 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Cognition and Development
- Vol. 8 (3) , 285-307
Abstract
Learning names for parts of objects can be challenging for children, as it requires overcoming their tendency to name whole objects. We test whether comparing items can facilitate learning names for their parts. Applying the structure-mapping theory of comparison leads to two predictions: (a) young children will find it easier to identify a common part between two very similar items than between two dissimilar items (because the similar pair is easier to align); (b) close alignments potentiate far alignments: children will be better able to extend a novel part name to a dissimilar object after having extended it to a similar object. In three studies, 227 preschool children mapped novel part terms to new animals or objects. Both predictions were confirmed. Children more accurately extended novel part terms to objects that were similar to the standard than to objects that were dissimilar (Experiments 1 and 2), and children more accurately extended novel part names to dissimilar objects after having extended them to similar objects (Experiment 3). We conclude that structure-mapping processes can support part learning.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- The robustness of learning through overhearingDevelopmental Science, 2005
- Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2003
- Early lexical acquisition: the role of cross-situational learningFirst Language, 1999
- Structure mapping in analogy and similarity.American Psychologist, 1997
- The Lexicon in Acquisition1993
- Systematicity as a selection constraint in analogical mappingCognitive Science, 1991
- The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examplesArtificial Intelligence, 1989
- Young children's understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger spaceCognitive Development, 1989
- Metaphor as Structure Mapping: The Relational ShiftChild Development, 1988
- Structure‐Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy*Cognitive Science, 1983