Development and Validation of an Enzyme Immunoassay for Detection and Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 Salivary IgA and IgG
Authors:
- Veronica P. CostantiniVCVeronica P. Costantini
- Kenny NguyenKNKenny Nguyen
- Zoe LyskiZLZoe Lyski
- Ana C. BardossyABAna C. Bardossy
- Amanda K. LyonsALAmanda K. Lyons
- Paige GablePGPaige Gable
- Preeta K. KuttyPKPreeta K. Kutty
- Joseph D. LutgringJLJoseph D. Lutgring
- Amanda BruntonABAmanda Brunton
- Allison C. BrownABAllison C. Brown
Open Access
- 28 February 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The Journal of Immunology
- Vol. 208 (6) , 1500-1508
Abstract
Oral fluids offer a noninvasive sampling method for the detection of Abs. Quantification of IgA and IgG Abs in saliva allows studies of the mucosal and systemic immune response after natural infection or vaccination. We developed and validated an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to detect and quantify salivary IgA and IgG Abs against the prefusion-stabilized form of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein expressed in suspension-adapted HEK-293 cells. Normalization against total Ab isotype was performed to account for specimen differences, such as collection time and sample volume. Saliva samples collected from 187 SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases enrolled in 2 cohorts and 373 prepandemic saliva samples were tested. The sensitivity of both EIAs was high (IgA, 95.5%; IgG, 89.7%) without compromising specificity (IgA, 99%; IgG, 97%). No cross-reactivity with endemic coronaviruses was observed. The limit of detection for SARS-CoV-2 salivary IgA and IgG assays were 1.98 ng/ml and 0.30 ng/ml, respectively. Salivary IgA and IgG Abs were detected earlier in patients with mild COVID-19 symptoms than in severe cases. However, severe cases showed higher salivary Ab titers than those with a mild infection. Salivary IgA titers quickly decreased after 6 wk in mild cases but remained detectable until at least week 10 in severe cases. Salivary IgG titers remained high for all patients, regardless of disease severity. In conclusion, EIAs for both IgA and IgG had high specificity and sensitivity for the confirmation of current or recent SARS-CoV-2 infections and evaluation of the IgA and IgG immune response.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID R01AI145835)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Immunology of COVID-19: Current State of the ScienceImmunity, 2020
- Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformationScience, 2020
- The species Severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus: classifying 2019-nCoV and naming it SARS-CoV-2Nature Microbiology, 2020
- A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in ChinaNature, 2020
- A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat originNature, 2020
- Humoral and Mucosal Immune Responses to Human Norovirus in the ElderlyThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2020
- Gamma Irradiation as an Effective Method for Inactivation of Emerging Viral PathogensThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2019
- Saliva and Gingival Crevicular Fluid (GCF) Collection for Biomarker Screening2019
- The utility of saliva for the assessment of anti-pneumococcal antibodies: investigation of saliva as a marker of antibody status in serumBiomarkers, 2016
- Mucosal Immune Responses to Meningococcal Group C Conjugate and Group A and C Polysaccharide Vaccines in AdolescentsInfection and Immunity, 2000