Reassessing the Returns to Analysts' Stock Recommendations
Authors:
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in CFA Magazine
- Vol. 59 (2) , 88-96
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can Investors Profit from the Prophets? Security Analyst Recommendations and Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- Conflict of Interest and the Credibility of Underwriter Analyst RecommendationsThe Review of Financial Studies, 1999
- Improved Methods for Tests of Long‐Run Abnormal Stock ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- Underwriting relationships, analysts' earnings forecasts and investment recommendationsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1998
- Caveat Compounder: A Warning about Using the Daily CRSP Equal‐Weighted Index to Compute Long‐Run Excess ReturnsThe Journal of Finance, 1998
- Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statisticsJournal of Financial Economics, 1997
- The Anatomy of the Performance of Buy and Sell RecommendationsCFA Magazine, 1995
- Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bondsJournal of Financial Economics, 1993
- Biases in computed returnsJournal of Financial Economics, 1983
- The value line enigma (1965–1978)Journal of Financial Economics, 1982