Safeguarding Data Integrity in Online Podiatry Research: Understanding and Managing Non-Genuine Participation.
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 March 2026
- journal article
- Vol. 19 (1) , e70141
Abstract
Online research methods have become increasingly common in podiatry, offering efficient, low cost and convenient data collection. Emerging evidence from online studies suggests that the integrity of online research is being compromised by participants who are not genuine: for example, they may not have the relevant health condition they are claiming to have or they may not be taking the trial medication as instructed. In health research, the consequences of non-genuine participants are significant, including unreliable data, wasted time and funding, researcher distress, loss of participant trust and, in some cases, cancelled projects. Growing awareness of fraudulent participation and reports of these challenges highlights the need for structured approaches designed to safeguard data integrity and the trustworthiness of results. In the United Kingdom, the University of Nottingham has recently published practical guidance for researchers and ethics committees on handling potential non-genuine participants. The aim of this commentary is to raise awareness of the risks posed by non-genuine participation in online research and to provide a summary of the recently published practical strategies for researchers to safeguard the integrity of their data.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Threats of Bots and Other Bad Actors to Data Quality Following Research Participant Recruitment Through Social Media: Cross-Sectional QuestionnaireJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2020
- Participant carelessness and fraud: Consequences for clinical research and potential solutions.Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 2020
- Quality of reporting web-based and non-web-based survey studies: What authors, reviewers and consumers should considerPLOS ONE, 2018
- Addressing Participant Validity in a Small Internet Health Survey (The Restore Study): Protocol and Recommendations for Survey Response ValidationJMIR Research Protocols, 2018
- Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: Recommendations based on a methodological systematic reviewPalliative Medicine, 2017
- Detecting, Preventing, and Responding to “Fraudsters” in Internet Research: Ethics and TradeoffsJournal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2015
- Strategies to address participant misrepresentation for eligibility in Web‐based researchInternational Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2014
- Standards should be applied in the prevention and handling of missing data for patient-centered outcomes research: a systematic review and expert consensusJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014
- Identifying Multiple Submissions in Internet Research: Preserving Data IntegrityAIDS and Behavior, 2008
- Improving the Quality of Web Surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES)Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2004