The difficult challenge of a two-phase CFD modelling for all flow regimes
Author:
- D. BestionDBD. Bestion
- 1 November 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Nuclear Engineering and Design
- Vol. 279, 116-125
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Applicability of two-phase CFD to nuclear reactor thermalhydraulics and elaboration of Best Practice GuidelinesNuclear Engineering and Design, 2012
- FROM THE DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION TO SYSTEM CODES - PERSPECTIVE FOR THE MULTI-SCALE ANALYSIS OF LWR THERMALHYDRAULICSNuclear Engineering and Technology, 2010
- EXTENSION OF CFD CODES APPLICATION TO TWO-PHASE FLOW SAFETY PROBLEMSNuclear Engineering and Technology, 2010
- On the bubble departure diameter and release frequency based on numerical simulation resultsInternational Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 2009
- Review of Available Data for Validation of Nuresim Two‐Phase CFD Software Applied to CHF InvestigationsScience and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2008
- A first assessment of the NEPTUNE_CFD code: Instabilities in a stratified flow comparison between the VOF method and a two-field approachInternational Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 2008
- Large eddy simulation of a bubble column using dynamic sub-grid scale modelChemical Engineering Journal, 2008
- CFD simulation of bubbly flows: Random dispersion modelChemical Engineering Science, 2007
- NEPTUNE: A New Software Platform for Advanced Nuclear Thermal HydraulicsNuclear Science and Engineering, 2007
- FASTNET: A PROPOSAL FOR A TEN-YEAR EFFORT IN THERMAL-HYDRAULIC RESEARCHMultiphase Science and Technology, 1999