Calibration- and Workload-Aware Machine Learning for PTSD-Focused Triage in Children Referred Following Sexual Abuse
Open Access
- 24 October 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (21) , 3477
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Early identification of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) after childhood sexual abuse may support timely assessment, but triage requires evaluation of calibration, missed cases, and referral workload. This study assessed whether routinely recorded information could support prioritization for PTSD-focused assessment. Methods: This retrospective single-center study evaluated classification of post-event diagnostic outcomes documented by a specialist child and adolescent psychiatrist in 311 forensic referral records. DSM-5 diagnoses were grouped as PTSD versus no recorded post-event psychiatric diagnosis (n = 218; PTSD = 106) and PTSD versus other non-PTSD clinical outcomes (n = 199; PTSD = 106). Five models were compared. Within each evaluation design, preprocessing, model selection, sigmoid calibration, and threshold derivation were confined to the development partition; each pipeline was applied unchanged to held-out or chronologically later records. Results: Histogram-based gradient boosting yielded a held-out ROC-AUC of 0.6190 (95% CI, 0.4472–0.7853) and PR-AUC of 0.6578 in the primary formulation. Its threshold flagged 36 of 44 records and captured 18 of 21 PTSD cases (sensitivity, 0.8571; specificity, 0.2174). LightGBM yielded a ROC-AUC of 0.6441 (95% CI, 0.4475–0.8125) and PR-AUC of 0.6805 in the secondary formulation. Its threshold flagged 30 of 40 records and captured 18 of 21 PTSD cases (sensitivity, 0.8571; specificity, 0.3684). Calibration reduced Brier scores to 0.2537 and 0.2401, but the calibrated primary model remained slightly worse than the prevalence-only reference (Brier skill score, −0.0165; calibration slope, 0.4276). Temporal ROC-AUC values were 0.6358 and 0.6767, with high workloads. Conclusions: Routinely recorded information provided modest discrimination, and high case capture required assessment of most records. External validation, prospective workflow evaluation, and local recalibration are required before clinical use.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Child Sexual AbusePediatric Clinics of North America, 2025
- Machine learning algorithms for predicting PTSD: a systematic review and meta-analysisBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2025
- TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methodsBMJ, 2024
- Machine learning prediction of posttraumatic stress disorder trajectories following traumatic injury: Identification and validation in two independent samplesJournal of Traumatic Stress, 2022
- Prediction of the development of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder in sexually abused children using a random forest classifierJournal of Affective Disorders, 2021
- Estimation of the Development of Depression and PTSD in Children Exposed to Sexual Abuse and Development of Decision Support Systems by Using Artificial IntelligenceJournal of Child Sexual Abuse, 2020
- Ensemble machine learning prediction of posttraumatic stress disorder screening status after emergency room hospitalizationJournal of Anxiety Disorders, 2018
- Machine Learning Approaches for Clinical Psychology and PsychiatryAnnual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2018
- Quantitative forecasting of PTSD from early trauma responses: A Machine Learning applicationJournal of Psychiatric Research, 2014
- Random ForestsMachine Learning, 2001