Comparison of Inguinal and Subinguinal Microsurgical Varicocelectomy and the Impact of External Spermatic Vein Ligation on Semen Parameters
Open Access
- 1 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Journal Of Clinical Practice
- Vol. 2026 (1)
Abstract
Objective: Varicocele is the most common correctable cause of male infertility, and microsurgical varicocelectomy (MSV) is the gold standard treatment. This study aims to compare the inguinal and subinguinal approaches in microsurgery and to evaluate the effect of external spermatic vein (ESV) ligation on semen parameters. Materials and Methods: A total of 464 patients who underwent MSV between January 2017 and December 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical approach: subinguinal ( n = 133) and inguinal ( n = 331). Semen analysis was performed preoperatively and at the postoperative sixth month. Demographic data, intraoperative findings, and complications were recorded. Results: Both surgical techniques provided significant improvement in sperm concentration, total motile sperm count (TMSC), progressive motility, and morphology ( p < 0.001). The improvement in morphology was significantly higher in the subinguinal group compared to the inguinal group (0.82 ± 1.56 vs. 0.46 ± 1.45, p = 0.017). In the group where ESV ligation was performed, the increase in progressive motility (5.26 ± 11.92 vs. 2.74 ± 9.00, p = 0.019) and the decrease in immotility (−5.48 ± 12.22 vs. −2.83 ± 14.13, p = 0.035) were more pronounced. Furthermore, an increase in the number of ESVs showed a significant correlation with an increase in progressive motility ( r = 0.144, p = 0.002) and a decrease in immotility ( r = −0.124, p = 0.007). The subinguinal approach significantly increased the probability of accessing the ESV (82.7% vs. 57.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusion: MSV provides effective improvement in semen parameters. The subinguinal approach is more advantageous for morphological improvement and accessing ESVs. Ligation of the ESVs has a positive effect, particularly on sperm motility, and should be considered a critical step for surgical success.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Role of varicocele repair in the era of assisted reproductive technologies: Lessons from 2000 cases of microsurgical varicocele repairReproductive Medicine and Biology, 2024
- Systematic Review of the Impact of Varicocele Grade on Response to Surgical ManagementJournal of Urology, 2020
- A Novel Approach of Microscopic Subinguinal Varicocelectomy With a “Pulling” StrategyUrology, 2016
- Varicocele Is Associated with Impaired Semen Quality and Reproductive Hormone Levels: A Study of 7035 Healthy Young Men from Six European CountriesEuropean Urology, 2016
- Microanatomy of the spermatic cords during microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy: initial experience in Asian menAsian Journal of Andrology, 2012
- The Impact of Varicocelectomy on Sperm Parameters: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Urology, 2012
- Does Varicocele Repair Improve Male Infertility? An Evidence-Based Perspective From a Randomized, Controlled TrialEuropean Urology, 2011
- Efficacy of Varicocelectomy in Improving Semen Parameters: New Meta-analytical ApproachUrology, 2007
- Comparison of Outcomes of Different Varicocelectomy Techniques: Open Inguinal, Laparoscopic, and Subinguinal Microscopic Varicocelectomy: A Randomized Clinical TrialUrology, 2007
- Intraoperative Varicocele Anatomy: A Microscopic Study of the Inguinal Versus Subinguinal ApproachJournal of Urology, 2003