OpenSAFELY: Representativeness of electronic health record platform OpenSAFELY-TPP data compared to the population of England
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 18 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by F1000 Research Ltd in Wellcome Open Research
- Vol. 7, 191
Abstract
Background: Since its inception in March 2020, data from the OpenSAFELY-TPP electronic health record platform has been used for more than 20 studies relating to the global COVID-19 emergency. OpenSAFELY-TPP data is derived from practices in England using SystmOne software, and has been used for the majority of these studies. We set out to investigate the representativeness of OpenSAFELY-TPP data by comparing it to national population estimates. Methods: With the approval of NHS England, we describe the age, sex, Index of Multiple Deprivation and ethnicity of the OpenSAFELY-TPP population compared to national estimates from the Office for National Statistics. The five leading causes of death occurring between the 1st January 2020 and the 31st December 2020 were also compared to deaths registered in England during the same period. Results: Despite regional variations, TPP is largely representative of the general population of England in terms of IMD (all within 1.1 percentage points), age, sex (within 0.1 percentage points), ethnicity and causes of death. The proportion of the five leading causes of death is broadly similar to those reported by ONS (all within 1 percentage point). Conclusions: Data made available via OpenSAFELY-TPP is broadly representative of the English population. Users of OpenSAFELY must consider the issues of representativeness, generalisability and external validity associated with using TPP data for health research. Although the coverage of TPP practices varies regionally across England, TPP registered patients are generally representative of the English population as a whole in terms of key demographic characteristics.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- Asthma UK
- National Institute for Health Research
- UK Research and Innovation (COV0076;MR/V015737/1)
- Longitudinal Health and Wellbeing strand of the National Core Studies programme
- Wellcome Trust (222097)
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Electronic Health Record Interface Design on Unsafe Prescribing of Ciclosporin, Tacrolimus, and Diltiazem: Cohort Study in English National Health Service Primary CareJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2020
- Changes in health in the countries of the UK and 150 English Local Authority areas 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016The Lancet, 2018
- Spatial distribution of clinical computer systems in primary care in England in 2016 and implications for primary care electronic medical record databases: a cross-sectional population studyBMJ Open, 2018
- Regional variation and predictors of over-registration in English primary care in 2014: a spatial analysisJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2018
- Geographical epidemiology of health and overall deprivation in England, its changes and persistence from 2004 to 2015: a longitudinal spatial population studyJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2017
- Data Resource Profile: Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)International Journal of Epidemiology, 2015
- Completeness and usability of ethnicity data in UK-based primary care and hospital databasesJournal of Public Health, 2013
- Commentary: Representativeness is usually not necessary and often should be avoidedInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Commentary: Should we always deliberately be non-representative?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2013
- Why representativeness should be avoidedInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2013