Does ambient PM2.5 reduce the protective association of leisure-time physical activity with mortality? A systematic review, meta-analysis, and individual-level pooled analysis of cohort studies involving 1.5 million adults
Authors:
- Po-Wen KuPo-Wen Ku
- Andrew SteptoeAndrew Steptoe
- Mark HamerMark Hamer
- Paola ZaninottoPaola Zaninotto
- Emmanuel StamatakisEmmanuel Stamatakis
- Ching-Heng LinChing-Heng Lin
- Bin YuBin Yu
- Ulla Arthur HvidtfeldtUlla Arthur Hvidtfeldt
- Xiang Qian LaoXiang Qian Lao
- Hsien-Ho LinHsien-Ho Lin
- Wei-Cheng LoWei-Cheng Lo
- Ole Raaschou-NielsenOle Raaschou-Nielsen
Open Access
- 28 November 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Medicine
- Vol. 23 (1) , 647
Abstract
Background: This study assessed whether higher levels of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) reduce the protective effects of leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) on all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality, and explored the PM 2.5 threshold beyond which attenuation occurs. Methods: We conducted two complementary investigations. First, a systematic review and meta-analysis (per PRISMA guidelines) identified eligible cohort studies from PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and SPORTDiscus (from inception to 6 January 2025) that examined the independent or joint associations of LTPA and PM₂.₅ with mortality among adults (≥ 18 years). Second, an individual-level pooled analysis using harmonized data from three cohorts was performed using Cox regression modeling to assess the associations observed in the meta-analysis. Results: In Study One, a total of seven cohort studies ( n = 1,515,094; deaths = 115,196) were included in the meta-analysis, revealing that the reduction in all-cause mortality risk diminished with higher PM 2.5 exposure. Meeting the recommended LTPA level (7.5–15 MET-h/week) reduced all-cause mortality risk by approximately 30% at PM 2.5 < 25 μg/m 3 but only 12–15% at 25 + μg/m 3 . Study Two (three cohorts; n = 869,038; deaths = 45,080) confirmed this pattern. Individuals meeting the recommended LTPA level (7.5–15 MET-h/week) had a lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to those in the highest-risk group (reference: < 1 MET-h/week and PM 2.5 : 35–50 μg/m 3 ). Hazard ratios (HRs) varied by PM 2.5 exposure, with lower HRs indicating a greater protective effect: 35–50 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61–0.93), 25–35 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57–0.79), 15–25 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.29–0.39), 10–15 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.28–0.41), and < 10 μg/m 3 (HR = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.25–0.37). Higher levels of LTPA were generally associated with lower all-cause and cause-specific mortality across most PM₂.₅ exposure categories, but the protective effects were attenuated at PM₂.₅ levels 25 + μg/m 3 for all outcomes and became non-significant for cancer mortality at 35–50 μg/m 3 . Conclusions: LTPA is beneficial for all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality even at relatively high PM 2.5 levels, with greater benefits observed under cleaner air conditions. However, its protective effects are attenuated at 25 + μg/m 3 for all outcomes and become less evident at 35–50 μg/m 3 , particularly for cancer mortality. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023395364.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science and Technology Council (NSTC 113-2627-H-005-001-MY4)
- Taichung Veterans General Hospital & National Chung Hising University (TCVGH-NCHU TCVGH-NCHU 1137618)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- The rise of multiple imputation: a review of the reporting and implementation of the method in medical researchBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2015
- UK Biobank: An Open Access Resource for Identifying the Causes of a Wide Range of Complex Diseases of Middle and Old AgePLOS Medicine, 2015
- Patterns of Leisure-Time Physical Activity Participation in a British Birth Cohort at Early Old AgePLOS ONE, 2014
- GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidenceJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Competing Risk Regression Models for Epidemiologic DataAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2009
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsBMJ, 2008
- Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysisStatistics in Medicine, 2002
- Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation.2000
- Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical testBMJ, 1997
- Graphical methods for assessing violations of the proportional hazards assumption in cox regressionStatistics in Medicine, 1995